Delhi High Court: Phonographic Performance Limited Not Entitled to Grant Licenses without Registratio  ||  SC: Limitation Begins From the Date When the Cause of Action First Accrued  ||  SC: Language is a Medium for Exchange of Ideas Not Become a Cause of Division  ||  SC: Once Plaint in Respect of Main Relief Stands Barred, Other Reliefs Claimed Also Fall Down  ||  SC: Wildlife Warden of Telangana to Take Immediate Steps to Protect Wildlife  ||  SC: Violence During Protests Against Waqf Amendment Act is Disturbing  ||  UK SC: Trans Women Not Included in Definition of ‘Woman’ under Equality Act, 2010  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 32 to Challenge Supreme Court’s Own Judgments  ||  SC: If Suits Mention Cash Transactions Above ?2 Lakh, Court Must Report it to IT Department  ||  SC Takes Objection of Allahabad High Court Order Blaming Victim in Rape Case    

SC: When Company Isn’t Added as Accused the Director Who Signed Cheque is Not Liable for Dishonour - (23 Dec 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court while upholding the acquittal of a man convicted for dishonoured cheque, has observed that under Section 138 of NI Act authorised signatory of a company cannot be held liable for dishonour of a cheque drawn on company's account unless the company is arraigned as the principal accused.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DISHONOURED CHEQUE   AUTHORISED SIGNATORY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved