Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations  ||  Supreme Court: Children Should Not Undergo Psychological Tests in Custody Cases Unless Necessary  ||  Jharkhand HC: Lokayukta Cannot Delegate Core Adjudicatory Powers Even in Case Against Brother  ||  Ker HC: Complainant Can Invoke Presumptions After Proving Transaction, Cheque Execution Convincingly  ||  Supreme Court Cancels SARFAESI Auction Sale After 16 Years Due to a 5-Day Payment Delay  ||  Jhar HC Orders 2-Month Probe Deadline, DGP Monitoring to Overhaul Sexual Violence Response in State  ||  Delhi HC: Social Media Cannot Undermine Judiciary; Intermediaries Must Act Without Court Orders    

SC: Beneficial Laws for Women are Not Means to Chastise, Threaten the Husband - (20 Dec 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has observed that women need to be careful about the fact that the strict provisions of law like Sections 498A, 376, 377, 506 of the IPC are beneficial legislations for their welfare and not means to chastise, threaten, domineer or extort from their husbands.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   BENEFICIAL LEGISLATIONS   IPC  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved