Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory  ||  NCLAT Reaffirms That Borrower's Debt Acknowledgment Also Extends Limitation Period for Guarantors  ||  NCLAT: Oppression & Mismanagement Petition Cannot Be Filed Without Company Membership on Filing Date  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rajasthan Village Renaming, Says Government Must Follow its Own Policy  ||  NCLAT: NCLT Can Order Forensic Audit on its Own, No Separate Application Required  ||  NCLAT Reiterates That IBC Cannot be Invoked as a Recovery Tool for Contractual Disputes  ||  Delhi HC: DRI or Central Revenues Control Lab Presence in Delhi Alone Does Not Confer Jurisdiction    

Cal HC: Right to Property of Pvt. Landowners Must be Understood in Context of State’s Eminent Domain - (19 Dec 2024)

PROPERTY

Cal. HC has stated that the right to property of private landowners guaranteed under Article 300A of the Constitution of India must be understood in the context in which the sovereign power of Eminent Domain is exercised by the State.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   EMINENT DOMAIN   RIGHT TO PROPERTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved