SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

Cal HC: Right to Property of Pvt. Landowners Must be Understood in Context of State’s Eminent Domain - (19 Dec 2024)

PROPERTY

Cal. HC has stated that the right to property of private landowners guaranteed under Article 300A of the Constitution of India must be understood in the context in which the sovereign power of Eminent Domain is exercised by the State.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   EMINENT DOMAIN   RIGHT TO PROPERTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved