Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC  ||  Delhi High Court: Elective Surgery Does Not Bar Grant of Interim Bail on Medical Grounds  ||  Delhi HC: Consensual Romance With Minor Nearing 18 May be Considered For Bail in POCSO Case  ||  Delhi HC: Not Named In FIR Doesn’t Matter If Financial Links Show Active Role in NDPS Offence  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Rape is an Affront to Womanhood and a Brutal Violation of The Right To Life  ||  Supreme Court: Single Insolvency Petition Maintainable Against Linked Corporate Entities  ||  Supreme Court: Disputes are Not Arbitrable When the Arbitration Agreement is Alleged to be Forged  ||  Supreme Court: Temple Trust Does Not Qualify as an ‘Industry’ under the Industrial Disputes Act    

Cal HC: Right to Property of Pvt. Landowners Must be Understood in Context of State’s Eminent Domain - (19 Dec 2024)

PROPERTY

Cal. HC has stated that the right to property of private landowners guaranteed under Article 300A of the Constitution of India must be understood in the context in which the sovereign power of Eminent Domain is exercised by the State.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   EMINENT DOMAIN   RIGHT TO PROPERTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved