Supreme Court: Non-Signatory That is Not a Veritable Party Cannot Invoke an Arbitration Clause  ||  SC: Bail Can't be Cancelled For Police Non-Appearance Once Chargesheet is Filed and Trial is Attended  ||  SC: New Arbitration Bill Fails To Provide a Statutory Appeal Against Tribunal Termination Orders  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  SC: Employees Who Resign or Retire After Five Years of Service Are Entitled to Receive Gratuity  ||  Supreme Court: Higher Courts Should Avoid Unnecessary Remand of Cases to Lower Courts  ||  J&K&L HC: Under SARFAESI Act, Borrower's Right To Redeem a Secured Asset Ends With Auction Notice  ||  Calcutta HC: Income Tax Returns Can Be Used to Assess Victim's Income; ?39 Lakh Compensation Granted  ||  Delhi HC: Woman's Right to a Shared Household Does Not Allow Indefinite Occupation of In-Laws' Home  ||  Delhi HC: Director Disputes in a Company Do Not Qualify as Genuine Hardship to Delay ITR Filing    

Cal HC: Right to Property of Pvt. Landowners Must be Understood in Context of State’s Eminent Domain - (19 Dec 2024)

PROPERTY

Cal. HC has stated that the right to property of private landowners guaranteed under Article 300A of the Constitution of India must be understood in the context in which the sovereign power of Eminent Domain is exercised by the State.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   EMINENT DOMAIN   RIGHT TO PROPERTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved