NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Cal HC: Right to Property of Pvt. Landowners Must be Understood in Context of State’s Eminent Domain - (19 Dec 2024)

PROPERTY

Cal. HC has stated that the right to property of private landowners guaranteed under Article 300A of the Constitution of India must be understood in the context in which the sovereign power of Eminent Domain is exercised by the State.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   EMINENT DOMAIN   RIGHT TO PROPERTY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved