NCLAT: Resolution Professional Can’t Admit Claims Based On Uninvoked Guarantee  ||  NCLAT: Upon Approval of Resolution Plan, Claims not Included in RP Stand Extinguished  ||  All. HC: Police Must Ensure that Movement of Lawyers to Court is Unhindered  ||  Mad. HC: Can’t Bar Court from Entertaining more than One Application u/s 29A of A&C Act  ||  Kar. HC: Can Quash Cr. Proceedings on Basis of Witness Statements only in Rare Cases  ||  Kar. HC: Can’t Transfer Probe to CBI Merely because Accused is Sitting CM  ||  Bom. HC Issues Contempt Notice against Woman Circulating Objectionable Comments against SC & HC  ||  Del. HC Upholds Validity of Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013  ||  Mad. HC: Provision Preventing Arrest of Women is Directory not Mandatory  ||  Del. HC: Bald Allegations against IO Insufficient for Transferring Probe to Another Agency    

Ker. HC: Proceedings Under POCSO Cannot be Quashed on Ground of Settlement between Parties - (19 Dec 2024)

CRIMINAL

Kerala High Court has held that the legal position is apparent and comprehensive that criminal proceedings involving very serious offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 could not be quashed on the ground that the accused and the complainant had settled the matter.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS   POCSO ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved