SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved  ||  Calcutta HC: Conviction under Essential Commodities Act Invalid if Stock Measured With a 'Stick'  ||  Kerala High Court: Universities Must Regulate Student Political Activities to Curb Campus Violence  ||  Calcutta HC: Accused Has No Right on Investigation Mode or Impleadment in Probe Writ  ||  Gauhati HC: POCSO Probes Must be Child-Friendly, With Sensitized Investigators to Ensure Clear Truth  ||  Kerala HC: Orders Barring Disclosure of Witness Statements Must State Reasons For Each Witness  ||  SC: Hard to Believe Married Woman Was Lured Into Sex by False Marriage Promise; Case Quashed    

Del. HC: Judgment Requiring ED to Supply ‘Reasons to Believe’ to Arrestee to be Applied Prospectively - (04 Dec 2024)

CRIMINAL

Delhi High Court has held that the judgment in Arvind Kejriwal Vs. Directorate of Enforcement (MANU/SC/0610/2024; 2024 INSC 512), requiring supply of “reasons to believe” by Enforcement Directorate to a person arrested under PMLA as a separate document, will not have a retrospective application.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE   RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved