Delhi HC Rejects Plea Against BCCI Team Named 'Team India', Terms it a Sheer Waste of Time  ||  Bombay HC: No Absolute Right for Citizens to Access Public Offices  ||  Delhi HC: Suit Withdrawal After Compromise Doesn’t Result in Executable Decree  ||  Delhi HC: ITSC Abolition Doesn’t Void Settlement Pleas Filed Between Feb 1–Mar 31, 2021  ||  Rajasthan HC: State Must Set Up Trauma Centre, Art Institute; Temple Board Can Only Assist  ||  Kerala HC: LIC Cancer Cover Starts From First Diagnosis After Waiting Period, Not Expert Opinion  ||  Kerala HC: Spouse’s Ill Treatment of Children is Cruelty under Section 10(1) Divorce Act  ||  Supreme Court Acquits Chennai Man Sentenced to Death in Child Rape-Murder Case  ||  SC: Only Disclosure Leading to Weapon Recovery Admissible under Section 27 Evidence Act  ||  Supreme Court Orders Strict Enforcement on Helmets, Lane Discipline & Headlight Use    

SC: Recovery on Basis of Statement by Accused before Section 27 Disclosure is Not Admissible - (29 Nov 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Supreme Court has held that recovery of materials on the basis of statements given by accused prior to recording of statement under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is not admissible.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   STATEMENT BY ACCUSED   SECTION 27  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved