Supreme Court Explains that Comprehensive Motor Insurance Covers Occupants of a Vehicle  ||  Supreme Court: Judgments Operate Retrospectively Unless Made Prospective  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Principles Governing Witness Recall under Order 18 Rule 17 of CPC  ||  Gujarat High Court: Res Judicata Prevents Trustees from Reopening Trust Property Disputes  ||  Allahabad HC: Trial Courts Cannot Examine Witnesses to Generate Fresh Evidence Before Cognizance  ||  Rajasthan HC: Funds Collected From an Illegal Toll Plaza Must Be Used For Tree Plantation  ||  Delhi HC: Minor’s Signature Alone Cannot Establish Consent for Pregnancy Termination  ||  Karnataka HC Allows ECIR Challenge under Article 226, Rejects ED’s Immunity Claim  ||  Allahabad High Court Upholds Transfer of a Dissolved Society's Assets to its Successor Company  ||  P&H HC: Cheque Bounce Cases Remain Compoundable Even After Appellate Courts Uphold Conviction    

Sikkim HC: If Underlying Contract is Invalid, Arb. Agreement Allows Tribunal to Assume Jurisdiction - (15 Nov 2024)

ARBITRATION

Sikkim HC has noted that the validity of an arbitration agreement, in the face of the invalidity of the underlying contract, allows the Arbitral Tribunal to assume jurisdiction and decide on its own jurisdiction by determining the existence and validity of the arbitration agreement.

Tags : SIKKIM HIGH COURT   ARBITRATION AGREEMENT   ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved