Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation  ||  SC: Arbitral Awards May Be Challenged By Legal Representatives Only U/S 34, Not Via Article 227  ||  SC Stressed Caution in Uniformed Service Appointments and Restored Dismissal of an Unfit Constable  ||  Supreme Court: Higher Qualifications Cannot Replace the Required Minimum Experience Criteria  ||  Delhi High Court: Bank's Guard Post Involves Handling Arms, Strict Background Disclosure is Essential  ||  Delhi High Court: CARA Must Obtain Foreign Clearances Before Issuing NOC For Inter-Country Adoption  ||  Punjab & Haryana HC: Grounds of Arrest Need Not Be Reissued For a Second Arrest in the Same FIR  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Valid Caste Certificate Required To Prove SC/ST Act Offences; Oral Claim Not Enough  ||  Supreme Court Directs Preventive Detention to Curb Illegal Mining in Chambal Sanctuary  ||  SC: Courts Must Frame Points For Determination and Give Reasoned Judgments in Ex Parte Cases    

HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Award Unless Patent Illegality Established u/s 34 of A&C Act - (14 Nov 2024)

ARBITRATION

Himachal Pradesh High Court has stated that an interference with the award can only be made under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when ‘patent illegality’ has been established.

Tags : HP HIGH COURT   SECTION 34   PATENT ILLEGALITY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved