SC Stays Delhi HC’s Direction to Azure Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. to pay PPL as Per Tariff of RMPL  ||  IP Office Declares Starbucks, NDTV and Economic Times as Well-Known Trademark  ||  IP Office Declares Starbucks, NDTV and Economic Times as Well-Known Trademark  ||  Allahabad HC: Liking a Post Does Not Amount to Publishing or Transmitting it  ||  Supreme Court Criticizes Tahsildar Disobeying Directions of High Court  ||  SC: Fresh Suit Not Valid Remedy to Set Aside Decree Obtained on Basis of Coerced Compromise  ||  SC: When Strong Circumstantial Evidence Exists, Absence of Motive No Ground For Acquittal  ||  SC: Court Should Not Interfere With Order Granting Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA  ||  SC Advises Man to File Suit for Alleged Disability Due to Covishield Vaccine  ||  Supreme Court: Need to Impose Timelimit for Oral Submissions in Arbitration Cases    

SC: Perversity in Award Due to Non-Consideration of Vital Evidence is Sufficient for Interference - (12 Nov 2024)

ARBITRATION

SC has observed that if there is a perversity in the award insofar as non-consideration of vital evidence is concerned, the same tantamounts to violation of fundamental policy of Indian Law as well as gives rise to a patent illegality, which is a sufficient ground for interference u/s 34 of A&C Act.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   VITAL EVIDENCE   FUNDAMENTAL POLICY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved