Supreme Court: Expecting a Minor to Respond to a Public Court Notice is ‘Perverse’  ||  SC: Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Applies to S. 11 Arbitration Act, Barring Fresh Arbiration After Abandonment  ||  SC: Later Sanction Requirement Won’t Invalidate Cognizance Taken When No Prior Bar Existed  ||  SC: Documents Not Admitted by an Employee in an Enquiry Must be Proved Through Witnesses  ||  Delhi HC: MHA Has Authority to Initiate Disciplinary Proceedings Against AGMUT IAS Officers  ||  MP HC: Financial Hardship or Mere Allegations of Lawyer’s Negligence Cannot Excuse Delayed Appeal  ||  Patna HC: Blanket Approach of Denying Public Employment to Individuals Named in an FIR is Unfair  ||  Kerala HC: Repeated Possession of Even Small Quantities of Narcotic Drugs Can Invoke KAAPA  ||  Calcutta HC: Employers May Deduct Penal Rent From Gratuity of Employees Refusing to Vacate Quarters  ||  Calcutta High Court: ECI Not Singling Out Bengal, More Transfers in Other Poll-Bound States    

SC: Court Must Apply Mind before Deciding Whether Proceeding Should be Quashed or Not - (16 Oct 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that the Court must apply its mind to the materials submitted in support of police report before taking a call whether the FIR and consequential proceedings should be quashed or not more so, when the FIR alleges an act which is reflective of a dishonest conduct of the accused.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   POLICE REPORT   CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved