Supreme Court: Foreign Judgment Unenforceable in India Without Fair Opportunity to Defend  ||  Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Decide Appeal Pending Before Statutory Authority Due to Delay  ||  Supreme Court: SDO Lacks Authority to Change Land Classification under UP Zamindari Abolition Act  ||  Supreme Court: Man Not Liable For Maintenance if DNA Test Proves He is Not the Child’s Father  ||  SC: Prison Must Not Dilute Rights of Disabled Inmates; Oversight Given to High-Powered Panel  ||  Delhi High Court: Judges Would Have to Recuse if Children as Central Govt Counsel is Treated as Bias  ||  Delhi HC: Fresh Tenders Allowed Despite Existing Contracts; Anticipatory Grievances Not Entertained  ||  Delhi High Court: Judges Cannot Respond Publicly; Criticism Must Be Responsible and Evidence-Based  ||  J&K&L High Court: IO Not Bound By FIR; Can Modify Offences in Final Chargesheet U/S 173 CrPC  ||  Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation    

SC: Court Must Apply Mind before Deciding Whether Proceeding Should be Quashed or Not - (16 Oct 2024)

CRIMINAL

Supreme Court has held that the Court must apply its mind to the materials submitted in support of police report before taking a call whether the FIR and consequential proceedings should be quashed or not more so, when the FIR alleges an act which is reflective of a dishonest conduct of the accused.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   POLICE REPORT   CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved