All. HC: Husband’s Death from Poisoning Doesn’t Qualify for Extraordinary Pension  ||  MP HC: Section 125 CrPC Not Constituted to Create Army of Idle People Waiting For Maintenance  ||  J&K: Insurance Company Bound to Pay the Claim Against the Sum Insured  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Bom. HC: MSMED Act Does Not Provide Mechanism for Challenging Award Passed Under Section 18  ||  Kar HC: Rule 9(5) Has Mandatory Application if Auction Purchaser is Unable to Pay Sale Consideration  ||  Chh. HC: Once Resignation is Accepted, Employee Cannot Claim its Withdrawal  ||  Bom. HC: Reasons for Delay Could Not Constitute Information as Defined Under RTI Act  ||  SC: Court Has to Apply Principles of Preponderance of Probability in Motor Accident Claim Cases    

SC: Government Order Modifying Previous Order Would be Applicable Prospectively - (03 Oct 2024)

SERVICE

SC has observed that if a subsequent Govt. Order is a modification of the earlier Govt. Order, its application would be prospective as retrospective application thereof would result in withdrawal of vested rights which is impermissible in law and the same may also entail recoveries to be made.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   GOVERNMENT ORDER   VESTED RIGHTS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved