NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Patna HC: Not Disclosing Reasons for Confiscating Goods is Violative of Article 14 of COI - (27 Sep 2024)

CUSTOMS

Patna High Court has observed that an officer confiscating goods without giving strong and compelling reasons for such confiscation shall render the order of attachment illegal and would be violative of Article 14 of COI.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   ARTICLE 14   CONFISCATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved