Bombay High Court: ‘GIRNAR’ a Well Known Trademark in India  ||  Kerala HC: Criminal Courts of District Judiciary Cannot Recall their Earlier Orders  ||  Madras HC: Only ‘Preponderance of Probability’ Required in Disciplinary Proceedings  ||  Raj HC: Non-Disclosure of Information Wasn’t a Ground for Disqualification Before 2015 Amendment Act  ||  Bom. HC: Workers in Statutory Canteens are Principal Employer’s Employees  ||  Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions  ||  Supreme Court: NCLAT Cannot Use its ‘Inherent Powers’ to Subvert Legal Provisions  ||  SC Refuses to Mark Presence of Advocate Who Did Not Argue the Matter  ||  SC Sets Aside HC’s Decision to Accept Aadhaar Card as a Proof of Date of Birth  ||  SC Permits Candidate with Blindness to Attend Interview for Selection of Civil Judges in Rajasthan    

Patna HC: Not Disclosing Reasons for Confiscating Goods is Violative of Article 14 of COI - (27 Sep 2024)

CUSTOMS

Patna High Court has observed that an officer confiscating goods without giving strong and compelling reasons for such confiscation shall render the order of attachment illegal and would be violative of Article 14 of COI.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   ARTICLE 14   CONFISCATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved