Whether a Life-Threatening Rescue by Cop Can be Treated as Routine Duty, Madhya Pradesh HC Clarifies  ||  Madhya Pradesh HC: Officer Cannot Oversee Department Conducting Disciplinary Proceedings Against Him  ||  Madras High Court: POCSO Act Does Not Exempt Romantic Relationships Involving Minors  ||  SC Upholds Haryana Rule Delaying Aid to Kin Accused of Murdering Government Employees  ||  Supreme Court: Lokayukta Special Police is Not Exempt From RTI as an Intelligence Body  ||  Supreme Court: Curable Irregularity in Appointments Cannot Nullify Entire Recruitment Process  ||  SC: Dismissal, Being the Severest Punishment, Should be Imposed Only For Grave Misconduct  ||  SC: Constructive Res Judicata Applies to Grounds Omitted Through Negligence or Inadvertence  ||  Madras High Court: Honour Killing is a Shameful Act and an Extreme Manifestation of Casteism  ||  Bombay High Court: Traditional Families Often Hesitate to Report Sexual Offences    

SC: Pending Investigation & Grant of Prosecution Sanction Not Enough to Adopt Sealed Cover Procedure - (26 Sep 2024)

SERVICE

SC has stated that in disciplinary/criminal proceedings against an employee, sealed cover procedure is to be resorted to only after issuance of charge-memo/charge-sheet is issued. Pending investigation & grant of prosecution sanction won’t be sufficient to enable authorities to adopt the procedure.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PROSECUTION SANCTION   SEALED COVER PROCEDURE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved