Supreme Court: Bail Remains the Rule and Jail the Exception, Even under the UAPA Law  ||  Supreme Court: Principle of Res Judicata Also Applies Between Stages of the Same Case  ||  Supreme Court: Govt Servant Has No Right to Old Rule Promotion Just Due to Earlier Vacancies  ||  Delhi High Court: Students Having Zero Attendance Cannot be Promoted to the Next Semester  ||  J&K&L HC: Replacing 'State' With 'Union Territory' in Public Safety Act Does Not Change its Nature  ||  Kerala High Court: Doctor Cannot Enrol as an Advocate Without First Cancelling Medical Registration  ||  Supreme Court: VAT is Not Applicable on Reliance’s Inter-State Gas Supply from KG Basin to UP  ||  Supreme Court: Co-Owner Can File Eviction Suit as Landlord under Bombay Rent Act  ||  Supreme Court: Mediclaim Reimbursement Cannot be Set off Against Accident Compensation  ||  SC: Hindu Succession Act 2005 Amendment Does Not Curtail Daughters’ Existing Inheritance Rights    

MP High Court: Children Prolonging Proceedings at Cost of Father, Cannot be Allowed - (18 Sep 2024)

FAMILY

MP HC while dismissing a plea filed by children of a senior citizen father concerning the ancestral property, has observed that the children have only one device and one motive to prolong the proceedings but that cannot be allowed to be at the cost of the father, who is a senior citizen.

Tags : MP HIGH COURT   ANCESTRAL PROPERTY   SENIOR CITIZEN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved