Allahabad HC: MPs, Judges and Ministers May Use ‘Hon’ble’; Civil Servants are Not Entitled to it  ||  Calcutta HC: Salary Withholding and Harassment Claims are Not Defamation Without Reputational Harm  ||  Gauhati HC: Officer Resigning Without New Govt Appointment Cannot Claim Pension under Assam Service  ||  MP HC: Attachment & Auction are Quasi-Judicial Duties of Tehsildar; Action Invalid Without Mala Fide  ||  Supreme Court: Fence-Sitters Cannot Raise Seniority Disputes Once Third-Party Rights are Settled  ||  SC: Medical Negligence Claims Can be Filed Against Deceased Doctor’s Legal Heirs Who Inherit Estate  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Must Be Considered if Speedy Trial Rights are Violated, Regardless of Offence  ||  Supreme Court: Article 226 Cannot be Used to Seek FIR Registration Without Exhausting Remedies  ||  SC: Dowry Deaths Remain a Grave Social Issue, Especially in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Karnataka  ||  Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227    

MP High Court: Children Prolonging Proceedings at Cost of Father, Cannot be Allowed - (18 Sep 2024)

FAMILY

MP HC while dismissing a plea filed by children of a senior citizen father concerning the ancestral property, has observed that the children have only one device and one motive to prolong the proceedings but that cannot be allowed to be at the cost of the father, who is a senior citizen.

Tags : MP HIGH COURT   ANCESTRAL PROPERTY   SENIOR CITIZEN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved