SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

MP High Court: Children Prolonging Proceedings at Cost of Father, Cannot be Allowed - (18 Sep 2024)

FAMILY

MP HC while dismissing a plea filed by children of a senior citizen father concerning the ancestral property, has observed that the children have only one device and one motive to prolong the proceedings but that cannot be allowed to be at the cost of the father, who is a senior citizen.

Tags : MP HIGH COURT   ANCESTRAL PROPERTY   SENIOR CITIZEN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved