SC: Under Order XXI Rule 102 CPC, A Transferee Pendente Lite Cannot Obstruct Execution of a Decree  ||  SC: RTE Act promotes fraternity and equality by children of judges and vendors studying together  ||  MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Cards are Not Definitive Proof of Date of Birth  ||  Chhattisgarh HC: Second Marriage During Subsisting First Marriage Void Unless Custom Permits It  ||  Allahabad HC: Will in Favor of Someone Does Not Affect Compassionate Appointment Based on Dependency  ||  MP High Court: Mere Illness of a Family Member, If Improving, is Not Sufficient for Interim Bail  ||  Bombay HC: ?25K Fine for Flying Kites With Nylon Manjha; Parents Must Ensure Responsible Conduct  ||  Delhi High Court: Home State Must be the First Preference For Claiming Insider IFS Cadre Allocation  ||  SC: Hindu Daughter-In-Law Widowed After Her Father-In-Law’s Death is Entitled to Maintenance  ||  SC: Vendor Remains a Necessary Party in Specific Performance Suits Even After Transferring Property    

MP High Court: Children Prolonging Proceedings at Cost of Father, Cannot be Allowed - (18 Sep 2024)

FAMILY

MP HC while dismissing a plea filed by children of a senior citizen father concerning the ancestral property, has observed that the children have only one device and one motive to prolong the proceedings but that cannot be allowed to be at the cost of the father, who is a senior citizen.

Tags : MP HIGH COURT   ANCESTRAL PROPERTY   SENIOR CITIZEN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved