Bombay High Court to Get New Bench at Kolhapur District  ||  SC: Employers Must Accommodate Workers Who Acquire Disability  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Bail Condition Forcing Conjugal Life With Wife  ||  SC Clarifies: MSME Protection Not Automatic Against SARFAESI  ||  Rajasthan HC Urges Amendment: Tribal Women Barred from Inheritance Under Hindu Succession Act  ||  Rajasthan HC: School Certificate Alone Not Proof of Victim's Age  ||  NIA Court: Court Rejects Claim ATS Tried to Frame RSS Chief in Malegaon Case  ||  Rajasthan HC: Prior Sanction No Shield Against Strong Prima Facie Evidence  ||  Patna High Court: Claim of Juvenility Can be Raised Before Any Court, at Any Stage  ||  SC: Delhi HC Can Restrict Senior Advocate Designation to Its Own Retired Judges    

Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. and Ors. - (High Court of Allahabad) (17 Aug 2015)

No necessity for complaint to aver actual date of service of notice against dishonoured cheque

MANU/UP/1009/2015

Banking

If the complaint contains the date of issuance of registered notice, merely not containing the date of receipt of information from the bank regarding the return of cheque as unpaid is not to be of much consequence. It was claimed by the Applicant (drawer of the cheque) that by not mentioning the date of service of notice in the complaint, no cause of action had been disclosed by the complainant. The Court held that once it was alleged that a registered notice was sent to the address of the drawer of the cheque, it was deemed to have been served or the addressee is deemed to have the knowledge of the notice.

Relevant : C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed and another MANU/SC/2263/2007 State of M.P. v. Hiralal and Ors. MANU/SC/1388/1996

Tags : BANKING   CHEQUE   DATE OF SERVICE   NOTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved