SC Cancels Chhota Rajan's Bail in 2001 Jaya Shetty Murder Case  ||  NCLAT: Workmen Can Claim Dues Post-Layoff If They Worked After Corporate Debtor's Notice Issuance  ||  NCLAT: Debt Can be Proved Through Any Documentary Evidence, No Written Contract Needed.  ||  Madras HC: Railway Authorities Can't Deboard Valid-Ticket Passengers Heading to Protest  ||  Delhi HC: Women’s Entry into Army Corps Can’t be Restricted; Vacant Male Posts Must be Open to Women  ||  Delhi HC: Pressuring Husband to Cut Ties With His Family Amounts to Cruelty; Ground For Divorce  ||  Bombay HC: Magistrate Need Not Pass Preliminary Order U/S 145 CrOC If HC or SC Directs Inquiry  ||  Delhi HC Allows Woman to Terminate 22-Week Pregnancy from False Promise of Marriage  ||  Supreme Court: Reasons Omitted In an Order May be Considered In Specific Circumstances  ||  SC: Execution of Arbitral Award Cannot be Stalled Just Because Section 37 Appeal is Pending    

Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. and Ors. - (High Court of Allahabad) (17 Aug 2015)

No necessity for complaint to aver actual date of service of notice against dishonoured cheque

MANU/UP/1009/2015

Banking

If the complaint contains the date of issuance of registered notice, merely not containing the date of receipt of information from the bank regarding the return of cheque as unpaid is not to be of much consequence. It was claimed by the Applicant (drawer of the cheque) that by not mentioning the date of service of notice in the complaint, no cause of action had been disclosed by the complainant. The Court held that once it was alleged that a registered notice was sent to the address of the drawer of the cheque, it was deemed to have been served or the addressee is deemed to have the knowledge of the notice.

Relevant : C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed and another MANU/SC/2263/2007 State of M.P. v. Hiralal and Ors. MANU/SC/1388/1996

Tags : BANKING   CHEQUE   DATE OF SERVICE   NOTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved