P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. State of U.P. and Ors. - (High Court of Allahabad) (17 Aug 2015)

No necessity for complaint to aver actual date of service of notice against dishonoured cheque

MANU/UP/1009/2015

Banking

If the complaint contains the date of issuance of registered notice, merely not containing the date of receipt of information from the bank regarding the return of cheque as unpaid is not to be of much consequence. It was claimed by the Applicant (drawer of the cheque) that by not mentioning the date of service of notice in the complaint, no cause of action had been disclosed by the complainant. The Court held that once it was alleged that a registered notice was sent to the address of the drawer of the cheque, it was deemed to have been served or the addressee is deemed to have the knowledge of the notice.

Relevant : C.C. Alavi Haji v. Palapetty Muhammed and another MANU/SC/2263/2007 State of M.P. v. Hiralal and Ors. MANU/SC/1388/1996

Tags : BANKING   CHEQUE   DATE OF SERVICE   NOTICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved