Mad. HC: Family Court should Ensure Conducting Proceedings Without Insisting Presence of Parties  ||  Delhi High Court: Court Can Waive of Requirement to Furnish Surety, if Satisfied  ||  Del. HC: Standard Required to be Met by Post Award S.9 Relief is Higher than Pre-Award S.9 Relief  ||  SC: Logical Progression in Compensation Estimation Process Would be to Identify Suitable Sale Deed  ||  SC: Power Under Section 432(1) of CrPC Has to be Exercised in a Fair and Reasonable Manner  ||  SC: If Judge Only Pronounces Operative Part of Judgement then Reasons to Made Available in 2-5 Days  ||  SC: If Prosecution Docs. Admitted by Defence, Court Can Appreciate Creditworthiness of Evidence  ||  SC Restrains Centre and States to Act Upon Withdrawal of Madarssas Not Complying with RTE  ||  All. HC: Retroactive Application of Rulings to Arbitral Awards Would Create Legal & Procedural Chaos  ||  P&H HC: BCI Can Assume Revisional Jurisdiction Only When Matter is Disposed of by State Bar Council    

Raj. HC: Can’t Treat Pre-Arbitration Steps Mandatory if they Could Not be Fructified - (23 Aug 2024)

ARBITRATION

Rajasthan High Court has observed that if the pre-arbitration steps that are mentioned in the agreement could not be fructified, it cannot be said that those steps were mandatory in nature and in case of their failure no arbitration can be initiated.

Tags : RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT   PRE-ARBITRATION STEPS   ARBITRATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved