SC: Suit Alleging Coercion or Undue Influence Cannot be Rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC  ||  Cal HC: Once ED Attachment is Confirmed, Challenge Becomes Academic; PMLA Remedy Must be Pursued  ||  MP HC: Pen-Drive Evidence Cannot be Introduced At a Late Trial Stage Without Proof or Relevance  ||  Calcutta HC: Employee Can't be Stopped From Joining Rival Post-Resignation; Trade Secrets Protected  ||  Calcutta HC: Banks Must Provide Forensic Audit Report Before Calling an Account Fraudulent  ||  Del HC: Woman Cannot Demand Re-Entry to Abandoned Matrimonial Home if Alternate Accommodation Exists  ||  Calcutta HC: Land Acquisition For Industrial Park is Public Purpose; Leasing to Industry is Valid  ||  Patna HC: PwD Recruitment Must Comply With RPwD Act; Executive Resolutions Cannot Override the Law  ||  Madras HC: Individuals Facing Criminal Trial Must Get Court Permission Even to Renew Passports  ||  Calcutta HC: Demolition Orders Cannot be Challenged under Article 226 if a Statutory Appeal Exists    

Del. HC: Withholding Names of Institutes or Universities Attended by Current Employees is Justified - (14 Aug 2024)

RIGHT TO INFORMATION

Del. HC has held that Central Information Commissioner’s decision to withhold the names of institutes or universities attended by current employees is justified under Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 as disclosure of such information is clearly not in the larger public interest.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONER   RTI ACT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved