All. HC: No Period of Limitation in Suit for Declaration of Matrimonial Status of Parties  ||  Guj. HC: Lok Adalat Can Only Dispose of Matters Where there is Compromise Between Parties  ||  SC: Not Prudent for HC to Relegate Matter to Trial Court if there are Significant Delays  ||  SC: Failure to Furnish Docs. Relied on by Detaining Authority is Violative of Article 22(5) of COI  ||  SC: Can’t Reject Election Petition at Threshold When there is Compliance of Provisions of RP Act  ||  SC: Can’t Consider Resignation Final Unless its Acceptance is Communicated to the Employee  ||  SC: Once Compensation is Determined, it is Payble Even in Absence of Any Representation or Request  ||  Del. HC: Assessment of Employee’s Performance Must be Limited to the Specified Year  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Delve into Domain of Experts in Assessing Functional Disability of Medical Aspirant  ||  Cal. HC: When Monthly Paybale Amount Surpasses Threshold, Dispute Becomes Subject to Arbitration    

SC: If Land Acquisition Compensation Not Paid, Schemes Like Ladli Behna Will be Stopped - (14 Aug 2024)

LAND ACQUISITION

Supreme Court has reprimanded the State of Maharashtra for not coming up with a reasonable figure for compensation in cases where State illegally occupied a person’s property and warned the State that if no reasonable amount is decided it shall stop schemes like Ladli Behna.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   STATE OF MAHARASHTRA   LADLI BEHNA   LAND ACQUISITION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved