All. HC: Husband’s Death from Poisoning Doesn’t Qualify for Extraordinary Pension  ||  MP HC: Section 125 CrPC Not Constituted to Create Army of Idle People Waiting For Maintenance  ||  J&K: Insurance Company Bound to Pay the Claim Against the Sum Insured  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Bom. HC: MSMED Act Does Not Provide Mechanism for Challenging Award Passed Under Section 18  ||  Kar HC: Rule 9(5) Has Mandatory Application if Auction Purchaser is Unable to Pay Sale Consideration  ||  Chh. HC: Once Resignation is Accepted, Employee Cannot Claim its Withdrawal  ||  Bom. HC: Reasons for Delay Could Not Constitute Information as Defined Under RTI Act  ||  SC: Court Has to Apply Principles of Preponderance of Probability in Motor Accident Claim Cases    

Ker. HC: Untimely Death of Husband Sufficient Ground to Condone Delay - (03 Aug 2024)

LIMITATION

Kerala High Court has held that for seeking condonation of delay in filing an application under Section 394 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, untimely death of husband is sufficient reason to justify such delay.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   S. 394 OF CRPC   UNTIMELY DEATH  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved