Supreme Court: Expecting a Minor to Respond to a Public Court Notice is ‘Perverse’  ||  SC: Order 23 Rule 1 CPC Applies to S. 11 Arbitration Act, Barring Fresh Arbiration After Abandonment  ||  SC: Later Sanction Requirement Won’t Invalidate Cognizance Taken When No Prior Bar Existed  ||  SC: Documents Not Admitted by an Employee in an Enquiry Must be Proved Through Witnesses  ||  Delhi HC: MHA Has Authority to Initiate Disciplinary Proceedings Against AGMUT IAS Officers  ||  MP HC: Financial Hardship or Mere Allegations of Lawyer’s Negligence Cannot Excuse Delayed Appeal  ||  Patna HC: Blanket Approach of Denying Public Employment to Individuals Named in an FIR is Unfair  ||  Kerala HC: Repeated Possession of Even Small Quantities of Narcotic Drugs Can Invoke KAAPA  ||  Calcutta HC: Employers May Deduct Penal Rent From Gratuity of Employees Refusing to Vacate Quarters  ||  Calcutta High Court: ECI Not Singling Out Bengal, More Transfers in Other Poll-Bound States    

SC: Directors Can’t be Vicariously Liable for Offence of Company Unless their Involvement Shown - (03 Aug 2024)

COMPANY

Supreme Court has held that directors of a company cannot be made vicariously liable for offence committed by the company under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 unless specific averments that the directors were responsible for the business of the company at the time of the offence, are made.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   VICARIOUSLY LIABLE   DIRECTORS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved