SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’  ||  Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective  ||  Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO  ||  Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage  ||  Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law  ||  Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act  ||  Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation  ||  CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images  ||  Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order    

SC: Directors Can’t be Vicariously Liable for Offence of Company Unless their Involvement Shown - (03 Aug 2024)

COMPANY

Supreme Court has held that directors of a company cannot be made vicariously liable for offence committed by the company under the National Housing Bank Act, 1987 unless specific averments that the directors were responsible for the business of the company at the time of the offence, are made.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   VICARIOUSLY LIABLE   DIRECTORS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved