All. HC: No Period of Limitation in Suit for Declaration of Matrimonial Status of Parties  ||  Guj. HC: Lok Adalat Can Only Dispose of Matters Where there is Compromise Between Parties  ||  SC: Not Prudent for HC to Relegate Matter to Trial Court if there are Significant Delays  ||  SC: Failure to Furnish Docs. Relied on by Detaining Authority is Violative of Article 22(5) of COI  ||  SC: Can’t Reject Election Petition at Threshold When there is Compliance of Provisions of RP Act  ||  SC: Can’t Consider Resignation Final Unless its Acceptance is Communicated to the Employee  ||  SC: Once Compensation is Determined, it is Payble Even in Absence of Any Representation or Request  ||  Del. HC: Assessment of Employee’s Performance Must be Limited to the Specified Year  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Delve into Domain of Experts in Assessing Functional Disability of Medical Aspirant  ||  Cal. HC: When Monthly Paybale Amount Surpasses Threshold, Dispute Becomes Subject to Arbitration    

Ker. HC: Mode of Examination u/s 33(2) of POCSO Act to be Applicable Even if Victim Attains Majority - (01 Aug 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Kerala HC has held that the protection u/s 33(2) of POCSO Act will continue to remain for the victim, regardless of whether he or she attains the age of majority. Thus, the mode of examination contemplated u/s 33(2) of the Act is to be applied notwithstanding the victim crossing the age of eighteen.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   S. 33(2) OF POCSO   MODE OF EXAMINATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved