All. HC: Husband’s Death from Poisoning Doesn’t Qualify for Extraordinary Pension  ||  MP HC: Section 125 CrPC Not Constituted to Create Army of Idle People Waiting For Maintenance  ||  J&K: Insurance Company Bound to Pay the Claim Against the Sum Insured  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Ker HC: Charge Framed by Court Without Jurisdic. Will Not Affect Evidence Recorded by Special Court  ||  Bom. HC: MSMED Act Does Not Provide Mechanism for Challenging Award Passed Under Section 18  ||  Kar HC: Rule 9(5) Has Mandatory Application if Auction Purchaser is Unable to Pay Sale Consideration  ||  Chh. HC: Once Resignation is Accepted, Employee Cannot Claim its Withdrawal  ||  Bom. HC: Reasons for Delay Could Not Constitute Information as Defined Under RTI Act  ||  SC: Court Has to Apply Principles of Preponderance of Probability in Motor Accident Claim Cases    

SC: Employees Can Only Claim Pension if Permissible Under Relevant Rules - (29 Jul 2024)

SERVICE

SC has held that pension can be claimed only when it is permissible under the relevant rules or a scheme. If an employee is covered under the PF Scheme and is not holding a pensionable post, he cannot claim pension, nor can the writ court issue mandamus directing the employer to provide pension.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PF SCHEME   PENSION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved