NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Orissa High Court: Evidence Not Vitiated Merely Because Object is Openly Accessible to Public - (08 Jul 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Ori HC has observed that it is important to clarify that merely because an object is accessible to public, it would not vitiate evidence. The real test is not to ascertain whether the object is openly accessible, rather it is to see whether the same was visible to the bare eyes of the common people.

Tags : ORISSA HIGH COURT   S. 27 OF IEA   OPENLY ACCESSIBLE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved