SC: Mere Mention of 'Arbitration' Does not Form Agreement Without Clear Intent  ||  SC: No Entitlement to Job as Compensation for Land Acquired under Land Acquisition Act  ||  SC: Court Cannot Probe Credibility of FIR Allegations While Entertaining Quashing Plea  ||  SC: Notice under Indian Forest Act Does not Transfer Private Forests to Maharashtra Law  ||  SC: Unilateral Termination of Sale Agreement Invalid if Contract Does Not Permit it  ||  NCLAT: Pre-COVID Defaults do not Exempt Debtors From Insolvency Proceedings  ||  NCLAT: Liquidator Must Obtain NCLT Approval Before Conducting Private Sale  ||  NCLAT: Contract Termination for Performance Default Not Barred by CIRP Moratorium  ||  Kerala HC: Partial Specific Performance Not Allowed if Defendant Holds Undisputed Property Title  ||  Kerala HC: Complainant Must be Informed if Probe Against FIR-Named Accused is Dropped    

Orissa High Court: Evidence Not Vitiated Merely Because Object is Openly Accessible to Public - (08 Jul 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Ori HC has observed that it is important to clarify that merely because an object is accessible to public, it would not vitiate evidence. The real test is not to ascertain whether the object is openly accessible, rather it is to see whether the same was visible to the bare eyes of the common people.

Tags : ORISSA HIGH COURT   S. 27 OF IEA   OPENLY ACCESSIBLE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved