Allahabad HC: MPs, Judges and Ministers May Use ‘Hon’ble’; Civil Servants are Not Entitled to it  ||  Calcutta HC: Salary Withholding and Harassment Claims are Not Defamation Without Reputational Harm  ||  Gauhati HC: Officer Resigning Without New Govt Appointment Cannot Claim Pension under Assam Service  ||  MP HC: Attachment & Auction are Quasi-Judicial Duties of Tehsildar; Action Invalid Without Mala Fide  ||  Supreme Court: Fence-Sitters Cannot Raise Seniority Disputes Once Third-Party Rights are Settled  ||  SC: Medical Negligence Claims Can be Filed Against Deceased Doctor’s Legal Heirs Who Inherit Estate  ||  Supreme Court: Bail Must Be Considered if Speedy Trial Rights are Violated, Regardless of Offence  ||  Supreme Court: Article 226 Cannot be Used to Seek FIR Registration Without Exhausting Remedies  ||  SC: Dowry Deaths Remain a Grave Social Issue, Especially in Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Karnataka  ||  Supreme Court Outlines Principles Governing Exercise of Jurisdiction under Article 227    

Orissa High Court: Evidence Not Vitiated Merely Because Object is Openly Accessible to Public - (08 Jul 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Ori HC has observed that it is important to clarify that merely because an object is accessible to public, it would not vitiate evidence. The real test is not to ascertain whether the object is openly accessible, rather it is to see whether the same was visible to the bare eyes of the common people.

Tags : ORISSA HIGH COURT   S. 27 OF IEA   OPENLY ACCESSIBLE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved