Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

Orissa High Court: Evidence Not Vitiated Merely Because Object is Openly Accessible to Public - (08 Jul 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Ori HC has observed that it is important to clarify that merely because an object is accessible to public, it would not vitiate evidence. The real test is not to ascertain whether the object is openly accessible, rather it is to see whether the same was visible to the bare eyes of the common people.

Tags : ORISSA HIGH COURT   S. 27 OF IEA   OPENLY ACCESSIBLE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved