NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Orissa High Court: Evidence Not Vitiated Merely Because Object is Openly Accessible to Public - (08 Jul 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Ori HC has observed that it is important to clarify that merely because an object is accessible to public, it would not vitiate evidence. The real test is not to ascertain whether the object is openly accessible, rather it is to see whether the same was visible to the bare eyes of the common people.

Tags : ORISSA HIGH COURT   S. 27 OF IEA   OPENLY ACCESSIBLE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved