Supreme Court: Rape Conviction Possible Without S.376 Charge if POCSO Case Fails on Age Proof  ||  SC: Mere Long Possession Can't Establish Adverse Possession; Hostile Intent is Required  ||  Supreme Court Finds Gaps in FSSAI’s Proposed Warning Labels for Foods High in Fat, Sugar and Salt  ||  Supreme Court Quashes ITS Officer's 'Deadwood' Retirement, Orders Rs. 15 Lakh Payment  ||  Uttarakhand HC: District Magistrate to Establish Public Helpline within 24 Hrs amid Water Pollution  ||  Allahabad HC: Custodial Violence and Molestation Are Crimes, Not Police Duty  ||  Gujarat High Court: Bombay Public Trust Registration is Covered by Section 43 of the Waqf Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Advocates not Above Law, No Immunity from Lawful Police Inquiry  ||  Gauhati HC: Talaq-e-Hasan Valid, Requires Registration under Assam Marriage Act  ||  NCLAT: NCLT President Empowered to Transfer Cases from One Bench to Another    

Tel. HC: Person in Possession Has to Prove Dutiable/ Prohibited Goods Are Not Meant For Smuggling - (02 Jul 2024)

CUSTOMS

Telangana High Court has observed that under the Customs Act, 1962 the burden of proof that dutiable or prohibited goods are not meant for smuggling, shall lie on the person who is found in possession of such goods.

Tags : TELANGANA HIGH COURT   PROHIBITED GOODS   SMUGGLING  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved