Delhi HC: Income Tax Evasion Complaint Not Premature Despite Pending Reassessment  ||  Patna HC:Before Harshest Punishment, Authority Must Consider Officer’s Reply  ||  SC: All Stray Dogs in Delhi To Be Shifted To Shelters; No Release Back To Streets  ||  Delhi HC: State Must Avoid Delays Like Prosecutor Appointment  ||  SC Refuses to Delete Remarks Against Senthil Balaji  ||  SC: Cannot Restrict Convicted Persons From Forming Political Parties Solely Due To Disqualification  ||  Karnataka HC: Cannot Compel Govt to Follow National Education Policy  ||  SC Upholds Medha Patkar’s Conviction in VK Saxena Defamation Case  ||  SC Upholds Madras HC Order to Remove Political Flagpoles From Public Land  ||  SC Upholds Conviction of Punjab Jail Official For Undertrial Escape Plot    

Pat. HC: Secondary Evidence Determining Victim’s Age to Stand Proven if No Challenge Made by Accused - (01 Jul 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Patna High Court has observed that secondary evidence produced by the prosecution to determine the victim’s age under the POCSO Act, 2012 shall stand proven if the accused does not exercise his right to contest the admissibility of secondary evidence.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   SECONDARY EVIDENCE   VICTIM’S AGE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved