SCDRC Upholds Penalty of Rs. 5 Lakh Imposed on Airtel  ||  Delhi HC: Cannot Read WhatsApp Conversation as Evidence Without Mandatory Certificate  ||  Allahabad HC: It’s a Child’s Natural Right to Know and Meet His Parents  ||  Delhi High Court: ICAI Needs to be Enhanced and Strengthened  ||  Del. HC: CGPDTM to Prepare Draft Code of Conduct for Regulation of Patent and Trademark Agents  ||  Kerala High Court: To Constitute Abetment, Intentional Aid by Abettor Must be Shown  ||  SC: Bail Shouldn’t be Opposed for Seriousness of Offence if Prosec. Agency Can’t Ensure Speedy Trial  ||  Allahabad HC: In Consensual Relationships, POCSO Act Being Misused Against Teenagers  ||  Sik. HC: Conviction of a 24-Year-Old for Committing Rape on His Grandmother, Upheld  ||  Bom. HC: Consensual Relationship Between Man and Woman is Not a License to Exploit Partner    

Patna HC: Oral Evidence Admissible to Prove Contents of Document u/s 92 of IEA - (28 Jun 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Patna High Court has held that to prove the contents of documents under Section 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, oral evidence could be admissible if there is a claim about misdescription of the property regarding mentioning of wrong plot number.

Tags : PATNA HIGH COURT   S. 92 OF IEA   ORAL EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved