J&K&L High Court: Transfer Guidelines are Not Binding and Cannot Limit an Employer’s Transfer Powers  ||  Calcutta High Court: Procedural Delays Cannot Deny a Person’s Right to Adopt  ||  J&K&L HC: Pardoned Approver under Section 343 BNSS Need Not Stay in Custody Till Trial Ends  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Cannot Demand Charges under a Preferred Law When Acts Fall under Multiple Statutes  ||  J&K&L HC: Accused Cannot Demand Charges under a Preferred Law When Acts Fall under Multiple Statutes  ||  Allahabad HC: Civil Imprisonment For Default Does Not Absolve a Husband’s Duty to Pay Maintenance  ||  Supreme Court: SC Status Applies Only to Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists, and is Lost on Conversion  ||  Supreme Court: Post-Moratorium, Creditors Cannot Adjust Pre-CIRP Dues From Prior Deposits  ||  Supreme Court: CoC’s Commercial Wisdom Does Not Shield All its Decisions From Judicial Scrutiny  ||  SC Flags Systemic Bias in Granting Permanent Commission to Women Officers in Armed Forces    

Ker.HC:While Ordering Maintenance, Magistrate Must Specify Whether it is Provided under CrPC or HAMA - (17 Jun 2024)

FAMILY

Kerala High Court held that the Magistrate whilst ordering maintenance to the daughter under Section 20(1)(d) of the Domestic Violence Act should specify if the maintenance order is made under Section 125 of CrPC or Section 20(3) of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA).

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   DV ACT   DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT   HINDU ADOPTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACT   1956   HAMA   CR.PC  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved