Allahabad HC Grants Bail to AMU Professor Accused of Linking Rape to Hindu Scriptures  ||  Supreme Court Vacates Stay on Telangana HC Order Quashing Nomination of 2 MLCs  ||  Supreme Court: Place of Exclusive Jurisdiction Deemed as 'Seat' of Arbitration  ||  Allahabad HC: NCMEI Has Exclusive Power to Grant Minority Status  ||  P&H HC: Default Bail Can Be Granted by Magistrate/Sessions Court Even If Bail Plea Pending Before HC  ||  Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to AMU Professor Over Alleged Rape  ||  All HC: Don't Remand Accused to Custody If Chargesheet Filed Sans Arrest  ||  HP High Court: Trial Court Can’t Dictate Investigation Manner, If Remand Purpose Is Clear  ||  Supreme Court: Non-Signatories Have No Right to Attend Arbitration Proceedings  ||  Supreme Court: 'Gender-Neutral' Often Misunderstood As 'Gender Equality'    

Ker HC: Onus to Bring Statement Within Ambit of Sec. 32(1) of IEA is on Party Who Wishes to Avail it - (31 May 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Ker HC has observed that provisions of Section 32(1) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 are in nature of an exception and onus of establishing the circumstances that would bring a statement within any of the exceptions contemplated by Section 32 lies clearly upon party wishing to avail the said statement.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT   EXCEPTIONS  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved