Patna HC: Disciplinary Authority Cannot Impose Major and Minor Penalties in a Single Order  ||  Calcutta HC: Landlord Decides His Residential Needs; Courts Cannot Set Living Standards in Eviction  ||  Orissa HC: Second Marriage During Subsistence of First Remains Invalid Even After First Wife's Death  ||  Karnataka HC: Appeals Against Acquittal in Bailable Offences Lie Only Before High Court  ||  Supreme Court: Stamp Duty on an Agreement to Sell is Leviable Only if Possession is Transferred  ||  SC: Motive Becomes Irrelevant When Direct Evidence Such as a Dying Declaration is Available  ||  Supreme Court Issues Directions to CoC in Builder Insolvency Cases To Protect Homebuyers’ Interests  ||  MP High Court: Women Retain Reservation Benefits After Marriage if Caste is Recognized in Both States  ||  Allahabad HC: Police Must Prosecute Informants of False Firs, and IOs May Face Contempt if They Fail  ||  MP HP: Over-Age Candidate Cannot Claim Age Relaxation Due to Delay in Earlier Recruitment    

Trademark Dispute Over ‘Pe’ Settled Between Phone Pe and Bharat Pe - (30 May 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Digital Payment Firms ‘Phone Pe’ and ‘Bharat Pe’ have settled trademark dispute over the usage of ‘Pe’ as a suffix in their names. A joint statement was released by the companies announcing the withdrawal of all trademark oppositions against each other.

Tags : DIGITAL PAYMENT   PHONE PE   BHARAT PE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved