Utt. HC Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case after No Progress in Investigation in First 90 Days  ||  Ker. HC: Create Website for Citizens to Report Construction of Unauthorized Boards/ Banners  ||  Delhi. HC: Wrong Section in Application Not Fatal if No Prejudice Caused to Court/Opposite Party  ||  Allahabad HC: Women Artists in Orchestras are Often Subjected to Sexual Harassment  ||  Delhi HC Constitutes Fact-Finding Committee to Conduct Investigation Issues in Equestrian Sports  ||  Bom. HC: Right to Travel is Required to be Not Only Recognised but Should be Made More Meaningful  ||  Bom. HC: In Appeal against Award of Compensation Court Can’t Condone Delay Beyond 120-Day Period  ||  Bombay HC Slams Maharashtra Government for Failing to Reduce Air Pollution  ||  Del HC: If Reassessment Notice Issued During Lifetime of Deceased Assessee, Dept. Can Invoke S. 159  ||  SC Grants Benefit of Probation of Offenders Act to Accused on Ground of Settlement between Parties    

Trademark Dispute Over ‘Pe’ Settled Between Phone Pe and Bharat Pe - (30 May 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Digital Payment Firms ‘Phone Pe’ and ‘Bharat Pe’ have settled trademark dispute over the usage of ‘Pe’ as a suffix in their names. A joint statement was released by the companies announcing the withdrawal of all trademark oppositions against each other.

Tags : DIGITAL PAYMENT   PHONE PE   BHARAT PE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved