SC: Under RTE Act, States Cannot Justify Low Teacher Pay by Citing Centre’s Failure to Release Funds  ||  Supreme Court: While a Child’s Welfare is Paramount, It is Not the Sole Factor in Custody Disputes  ||  Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Reject a Plaint While Exercising Jurisdiction under Article 227  ||  SC: Merely Leasing an Apartment Does Not Bar a Flat Buyer’s Consumer Complaint Against the Builder  ||  Delhi HC: Unproven Adultery Allegations Cannot be Used to Deny Interim Maintenance under the DV Act  ||  Bombay HC: Storing Items in a Fridge isn’t Manufacturing and Doesn’t Make Premises a Factory  ||  Kerala HC: Disability Pension is Not Payable if the Condition is Unrelated to Military Service  ||  Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC    

Trademark Dispute Over ‘Pe’ Settled Between Phone Pe and Bharat Pe - (30 May 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Digital Payment Firms ‘Phone Pe’ and ‘Bharat Pe’ have settled trademark dispute over the usage of ‘Pe’ as a suffix in their names. A joint statement was released by the companies announcing the withdrawal of all trademark oppositions against each other.

Tags : DIGITAL PAYMENT   PHONE PE   BHARAT PE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved