P&H HC: Eyewitness Account Not Credible if Eyewitness Directly Identifies Accused in Court  ||  Delhi HC: Conditions u/s 45 PMLA Have to Give Way to Article 21 When Accused Incarcerated for Long  ||  Delhi High Court: Delhi Police to Add Grounds of Arrest in Arrest Memo  ||  Kerala High Court: Giving Seniority on the Basis of Rules is a Policy Decision  ||  Del. HC: Where Arbitrator has Taken Plausible View, Court Cannot Interfere u/s 34 of A&C Act  ||  Ker. HC: No Question of Estoppel Against Party Where Error is Committed by Court Itself  ||  Supreme Court: Revenue Entries are Admissible as Evidence of Possession  ||  SC: Mere Breakup of Relationship Between Consenting Couple Can’t Result in Criminal Proceedings  ||  SC: Bar u/s 195 CrPC Not Attracted Where Proceedings Initiated Pursuant to Judicial Order  ||  NTF Gives Comprehensive Suggestions on Enhancing Better Working Conditions of Medical Professions    

Cal. HC: Can’t Say Retracted Statement to be Involuntary Without Being Examined by Court - (17 May 2024)

CUSTOMS

Calcutta High Court has held that if the court is of the view that the statement recorded was not admissible on account of the retraction, that by itself cannot render the statement as involuntary. The duty casts upon the court to examine the correctness of the validity of the retraction.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   RETRACTION   INVOLUNTARY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2024 - All Rights Reserved