Supreme Court: Uncrystallized Contractual Damages Not an Operational Debt under Section 9 IBC  ||  Supreme Court: Interest Accrued in Suspense Account After NPA Classification is Recoverable as Debt  ||  Supreme Court: S.69 GST Arrest Order with “Reasons to Believe” Must Precede Arrest  ||  Supreme Court: Winding-Up Proceedings Period Cannot be Excluded under Section 14 Limitation Act  ||  Supreme Court: Separate Appeals Unnecessary Against Common Judgment on Suit and Counterclaim  ||  Supreme Court: Unsuccessful Party Can Seek Post-Award Section 9 Relief in Exceptional Cases  ||  Delhi HC Rejects Black Money Act Challenge, Imposes Rs. 60,000 Costs over Prosecution Avoidance  ||  Delhi HC Affirms Teacher's POCSO Conviction, Urges Schools to Encourage Children to Speak Up  ||  Kerala HC: NGO Funding Peaceful Protests Can't Justify FCRA Renewal Denial  ||  Delhi HC: Courts Cannot Judge Sufficiency of Material For Issuing Look Out Circular    

Cal. HC: Can’t Say Retracted Statement to be Involuntary Without Being Examined by Court - (17 May 2024)

CUSTOMS

Calcutta High Court has held that if the court is of the view that the statement recorded was not admissible on account of the retraction, that by itself cannot render the statement as involuntary. The duty casts upon the court to examine the correctness of the validity of the retraction.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   RETRACTION   INVOLUNTARY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved