SC: CIRP Need Not Be Set Aside Solely for Fraudulent Filing of Section 9 Plea  ||  Supreme Court: Compromise Decree Passed Without Impleading Necessary Party is Void  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Notice Valid if Sent to Drawer’s Address and Received by Family  ||  J&K&L HC: Minority During Attestation Cannot Justify Decades-Long Delay in Challenging Mutation  ||  Bombay HC: WhatsApp Circulation of Objectionable Photos Can Attract SC/ST Act  ||  J&K&L HC: Cardiac Arrest From Stress of Long-Distance Driving is Compensable  ||  Delhi HC: Accused Cannot Delay Trial and Then Rely on Delay to Seek Bail  ||  Calcutta HC: Insurer Must Compensate Child’s Accidental Death Despite Driver’s Fake Licence  ||  Bombay HC Tells X to Take Down Defamatory Post Targeting Serum Institute, CEO Adar Poonawalla  ||  Delhi High Court Restores Arbitral Award in DMRC’s Favour Passed by Employee-Arbitrator    

Cal. HC: Can’t Say Retracted Statement to be Involuntary Without Being Examined by Court - (17 May 2024)

CUSTOMS

Calcutta High Court has held that if the court is of the view that the statement recorded was not admissible on account of the retraction, that by itself cannot render the statement as involuntary. The duty casts upon the court to examine the correctness of the validity of the retraction.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   RETRACTION   INVOLUNTARY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved