SC: Courts Must Curb Unlicensed Money Lenders; Probes Need Not Wait For New Law  ||  SC: Gratuity May be Withheld While Criminal or Disciplinary Proceedings are Pending Against Employee  ||  SC: Weapon Recovery Useless Without Proof Linking it to Crime under Section 27 Evidence Act  ||  SC: Fines Also Run Concurrently When Sentences For Multiple Offences Run Concurrently  ||  SC Dissolves 10-Year Estranged Marriage, Quashes 80+ Cases in 'Matrimonial Mahabharata' Dispute  ||  SC: Board Resolution Signature Alone Doesn’t Prove Director’s Knowledge of Company Affairs  ||  Raj HC: Industrial Tribunal Allowing Workman Legal Representation But Denying Employer is Unequal  ||  Karnataka HC: Service Bonds Enforceable on Students With Subsidised Education, Not Bonded Labour  ||  Gauhati HC: Challenge to Marks Barred by Constructive Res Judicata When Party Accepts Limited Remand  ||  SC: Cheque Dishonour Complaint Can't be Quashed Pre-Trial if Sec 138 NI Act Conditions Met    

SC: Accused Can’t be Arrested by ED After Special Court has Taken Cognizance of PMLA Complaint - (17 May 2024)

CRIMINAL

SC has observed that after cognizance is taken of offence punishable under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) based on a complaint under Section 44, Enforcement Directorate (ED) is powerless to exercise powers under Section 19 to arrest the person shown as accused in the complaint.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE   PMLA  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved