Kerala HC Imposes Rs. 1 Lakh Cost for Filing Two Appeals Leading to Conflicting Verdicts  ||  Gujarat HC: Giving Probe Papers to Complainant Before Chargesheet is filed Is 'Prima Facie Dangerous'  ||  SC Quashes Army’s Gender-Biased JAG Policy as ‘Against Equality’  ||  SC to Jharkhand HC Judges: Take Leave to Clear Pending Judgments  ||  SC Stays NGT’s Rs. 50 Cr Fine on DJB & MCD Over Yamuna Pollution  ||  SC: Bar Councils Can't Collect "Optional Fees" During Enrolment  ||  Calcutta HC: In Framing Arbitration Agreement Words Used Must be Certain, Definite  ||  J&K HC: Can’t Evaluate Performance of Employee When on Sanctioned Leave During Covid  ||  Kerala HC: Public Paying Toll Fees Casts Responsibility on NHAI to Ensure Smooth Traffic  ||  Calc. HC: Writ Court Rejecting Claims Over Disputed Issues Doesn’t Bar Arbitration if Clause Exists    

AP HC: App. u/s 11(6) Can Only be Maintained if Parties Fail to Refer Dispute to Arbi. Even After Not - (15 May 2024)

ARBITRATION

AP HC has held that, for maintaining an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 it is required to be shown that parties have failed to act as per the provision and have failed to refer the dispute to the Arbitrator even after a notice has been served.

Tags : ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT   S. 11(6) OF A&C ACT   ARBITRATOR  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved