Bombay HC: Judicial Remand Extension Beyond 60 Days Without Hearing, Reasons is Illegal  ||  Telangana HC: Changing Arbitration Venue Without Consent is Legally Perversive  ||  J&K&L HC: Properly Addressed and Sent Notice Deemed Served Under General Clauses Act  ||  Jharkhand HC: Fresh Anticipatory Bail Plea Not Maintainable After Earlier Rejection under S. 482 BNSS  ||  Orissa HC: Res Judicata Principle Doesn’t Apply to Execution Proceedings under Order 21 CPC  ||  Orissa HC: Railways Strictly Liable for Passenger’s Death After Falling From Train  ||  Del. HC: Director Not Individually Liable for Asset Transfer Without Consideration under S.276 IT Act  ||  Delhi HC: No Blanket Protection for Litigants from Counsel’s Negligence  ||  Bombay HC: Board under Mathadi Act Has No Power to Review its Own Orders  ||  Delhi HC: Father Granted Custody When Mother’s Adultery Allegation Includes Neglect    

Del. HC: In-Mall Marketing Campaigns Also Advertisements, HUL Restrained from Comparing Products - (14 May 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Del. HC has restrained Hindustan Unilever Ltd. from comparing its Ponds products with Nivea for advertising or marketing activity and observed that activity undertaken either expressly or by implication or association is misleading and disparaging, and can cause irreversible prejudice to plaintiff.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED   IRREVERSIBLE PREJUDICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved