P&H High Court: Re-Investigation Cannot Nullify Existing Acquittal Despite Breach of Stay Order  ||  Gujarat HC: Illegal Mining Vehicle Complaints Must Be Filed Before Sessions Court, Not Magistrate  ||  Delhi High Court Lays Down Registry Directions for Dealing with Insufficiently Stamped Arbitral Award  ||  Delhi High Court: Victims Need No Leave to Appeal Acquittal or Conviction for Lesser Offence  ||  SC: Limitation Act Inapplicable to Revisions under Karnataka Land Revenue Act  ||  SC: Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI for Loans Acquired from NBFCs Outside the Act  ||  SC: Gujarat Prohibition Act Does not Bar Interim Seized Vehicle Release  ||  Supreme Court Quashes Rs. 425-Crore Customs Penalty Based on AI-Generated Fake Case Laws  ||  SC: Guilt cannot be Presumed Solely Due to Collusion Allegations against Investigating Officer  ||  SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings    

Del. HC: In-Mall Marketing Campaigns Also Advertisements, HUL Restrained from Comparing Products - (14 May 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Del. HC has restrained Hindustan Unilever Ltd. from comparing its Ponds products with Nivea for advertising or marketing activity and observed that activity undertaken either expressly or by implication or association is misleading and disparaging, and can cause irreversible prejudice to plaintiff.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED   IRREVERSIBLE PREJUDICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved