SC: Forfeiture of Earnest Money Impermissible When Both Buyer and Seller are at Fault  ||  Supreme Court: Gravity of Offence Cannot Defeat Speedy Trial; Pre-Trial Detention is Punishment  ||  SC: Terrorist Act under UAPA Includes Conspiracies to Disrupt Essential Supplies, Not Just Violence  ||  Supreme Court Directs Measures to Prevent False and Frivolous Complaints Against Judicial Officers  ||  SC: Mere Participation in Arbitration Doesn’t Bar Challenging Arbitrator; Waiver Must be in Writing  ||  SC: Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, the Plaintiff, as Dominus Litis, Cannot be Forced to Add a Defendant  ||  SC: Law Does Not Change With a New Bench; Decisions of a Coordinate Bench are Binding  ||  Delhi HC Absence of Formal Arrest under Section 311A Crpc Does Not Bar Giving Handwriting Samples  ||  Del HC: Security Guards Performing Duties Cannot Be Prosecuted For Wrongful Restraint or Molestation  ||  Bombay HC: Housing Society Earning From Telecom Towers Isn’t An ‘Industry’; Staff Get No Gratuity    

All. HC: Mentioning Certain Sections in Title of Claim Made to Labour Court Won’t Determine Jurisdi. - (14 May 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Allahabad High Court has observed that it is well settled that the title of an application/claim and reference made therein or merely mentioning certain sections do not determine the jurisdiction of a forum. The same only depends on the substance of the application/claim/demand.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   TITLE OF CLAIM   JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved