NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

All. HC: Mentioning Certain Sections in Title of Claim Made to Labour Court Won’t Determine Jurisdi. - (14 May 2024)

LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Allahabad High Court has observed that it is well settled that the title of an application/claim and reference made therein or merely mentioning certain sections do not determine the jurisdiction of a forum. The same only depends on the substance of the application/claim/demand.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   TITLE OF CLAIM   JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved