SC: Under RTE Act, States Cannot Justify Low Teacher Pay by Citing Centre’s Failure to Release Funds  ||  Supreme Court: While a Child’s Welfare is Paramount, It is Not the Sole Factor in Custody Disputes  ||  Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Reject a Plaint While Exercising Jurisdiction under Article 227  ||  SC: Merely Leasing an Apartment Does Not Bar a Flat Buyer’s Consumer Complaint Against the Builder  ||  Delhi HC: Unproven Adultery Allegations Cannot be Used to Deny Interim Maintenance under the DV Act  ||  Bombay HC: Storing Items in a Fridge isn’t Manufacturing and Doesn’t Make Premises a Factory  ||  Kerala HC: Disability Pension is Not Payable if the Condition is Unrelated to Military Service  ||  Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC    

Supreme Court: Concept of 'Parental Alienation Syndrome' Discussed in Child Custody Dispute - (09 May 2024)

FAMILY

SC has stated that Courts ought not to prematurely and without identification of individual instances of 'alienating behaviour', label any parent as a propagator. The aforesaid label has far-reaching implications that must not be imputed or attributed to an individual parent routinely.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME   CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved