Uttarakhand HC: Severity of POCSO Charges Alone Cannot Deny Juvenile Bail  ||  Madras HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Man Accused of Watching CM Vijay's Unreleased Film Online  ||  Jharkhand HC: Interest under Employees' Compensation Act Runs From Date of Accident  ||  Bombay HC Quashes Wakf Property Mutation as Enemy Property, Mandates Due Process  ||  J&K&L High Court: Limitation Must be Decided Before Hearing Appeal Against 31-Year-Old Mutation  ||  Allahabad HC Summons UP Home Secretary Over Delay in Custodial Death Compensation Guidelines  ||  Delhi HC Differs with DPIIT Paper, Says ChatGPT Injunction Would Hurt AI Development  ||  Supreme Court: MHADA can Enforce Developer's Rehabilitation Commitments  ||  SC: Transfer of Defrauded Funds To Accused's Account Alone Cannot Warrant Clubbing FIRs  ||  Supreme Court: States with Under 1,000 Consumer Cases Can Abolish Select District Commissions    

SC: Inclined to Hold That Accused in One Case Shouldn’t be Denied Anticipatory Bail in Another Case - (07 May 2024)

CRIMINAL

SC has observed that it is prima facie of the view that Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cannot be stultified and if a person is under arrest for an offence, he cannot get anticipatory bail in that case but he is entitled to get anticipatory bail in other, subject to a hearing.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SECTION 438 CRPC   ANTICIPATORY BAIL  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved