SC: Casual Workers Can't be Denied Regularisation if Similar Daily Wagers were Regularised  ||  Supreme Court: Illegal Change of Land Use under Punjab Act Cannot be Legalised Later  ||  Allahabad High Court: Magistrate Must Consider Closure Report Even After Taking Cognizance  ||  Allahabad HC: CGST Arrest Memo Must Include Grounds as Annexure; Reasons to Believe Not Needed  ||  Kerala HC: Petitioner’s Identity Must be Verified Via SHO in Cases of Bank Account Defreezing  ||  J&K&L HC: Undenied Pleadings are Deemed Admitted by Implication under the CPC  ||  Kerala HC: Transfer Order Pending Disciplinary Proceedings Cannot be Disguised as Punishment  ||  Allahabad HC: GST, Incentives, 0r Festival Advances Cannot be Deducted From Employee’s Retiral Dues  ||  SC: Absconding Accused Cannot Claim Anticipatory Bail Solely Because a Co-Accused Was Acquitted  ||  Supreme Court: District Cricket Bodies Must Adopt Good Governance Voluntarily, Not Follow BCCI Rules    

SC: To Summon Person u/s 319 CrPC as Additional Accused, Stronger Evidence is Needed - (06 May 2024)

CRIMINAL

SC has observed that degree of satisfaction required to exercise power under Section 319 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is well settled. Evidence before the trial court should be such that if it goes unrebutted, then it should result in the conviction of the person who is sought to be summoned.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   ADDITIONAL ACCUSED   STRONGER EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved