SC: Dismissal, Being the Severest Punishment, Should be Imposed Only For Grave Misconduct  ||  SC: Constructive Res Judicata Applies to Grounds Omitted Through Negligence or Inadvertence  ||  Madras High Court: Honour Killing is a Shameful Act and an Extreme Manifestation of Casteism  ||  Bombay High Court: Traditional Families Often Hesitate to Report Sexual Offences  ||  Jharkhand High Court Directs Circle Officers to Digitally Verify Land Records and Remove Mismatches  ||  MP High Court: Writ Court Cannot Grant Interim Relief Once Party is Relegated to Alternate Forum  ||  Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations    

PIL Seeking ‘Authoritative Interpretation’ of Section 66 PMLA Refused by Delhi High Court - (29 Apr 2024)

CRIMINAL

Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought an authoritative interpretation of Section 66 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Court granted liberty to the petitioners to raise the issue before appropriate courts.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION   AUTHORITATIVE INTERPRETATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved