NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings  ||  Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same  ||  Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted  ||  Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers  ||  SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority  ||  SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays  ||  SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal  ||  SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches    

Bom. HC: Trampoline Park in Lonavla Restrained from Using Trademark or Character of Mr. Bean - (18 Apr 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Bom HC has restrained a trampoline park in Lonavla from using trademark or character of series Mr. Bean and has observed that it is a case of false endorsement where impression given to consumers is that trampoline park is authorized or is a park of Plaintiff’s well-known registered trademark.

Tags : BOMBAY HIGH COURT   TRAMPOLINE PARK   TRADEMARK   MR. BEAN  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved