Delhi HC: Workman Cannot Claim Section 17(B) of the ID Act Wages after Reaching Superannuation Age  ||  Allahabad HC: Caste by Birth Remains Unchanged Despite Conversion or Inter-Caste Marriage  ||  Delhi High Court: Tweeting Corruption Allegations Against Employer Can Constitute Misconduct  ||  Delhi High Court: State Gratuity Authorities Lack Jurisdiction over Multi-State Establishments  ||  Kerala High Court: Arrest Grounds Need Not Mention Contraband Quantity When No Seizure is Made  ||  SC: Silence During Investigation Does Not Ipso Facto Mean Non-Cooperation to Deny Bail  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Cannot Re-Examine Answer Keys Even in Judicial Service Exams  ||  SC: Central Government Employees under CCS Rules are Not Covered by the Payment of Gratuity Act  ||  Supreme Court Holds CrPC Principles on Discharge and Framing of Charges Continue under BNSS  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Must Independently Assess SC/ST Act Charges in Section 14A Appeals    

Supreme Court: Actual Statement Made by Person in the Court is Evidence Before Court - (16 Apr 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Supreme Court has observed that a statement made by a person in the Court itself is to be considered as evidence before the Court and not the statement that has been recorded under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SECTION 50 OF PMLA   EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved