Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order  ||  Supreme Court: Certiorari Can Quash a Tribunal Decision That is Grossly Perverse  ||  Supreme Court: Informant’s Consent is Not Required to Quash a Case Settled With the Victim  ||  Madras High Court: False Posts Against a Minister are Not an Offence Without Intent to Cause Alarm  ||  Delhi High Court: Police Cannot Pick and Choose Among Accused Persons for Arrest  ||  J&K High Court: Bar Associations are Not ‘State’ under Article 12 and are Outside Writ Jurisdiction  ||  Calcutta High Court: Third Parties Can Challenge Inaction Against Unauthorised Construction  ||  Madras High Court: Being an Advocate Does Not Mean a Person Cannot Commit an Offence  ||  Delhi High Court: Husband Cannot Reopen Settled Marital Disputes to Avoid Maintenance Liability  ||  Calcutta High Court: State Cannot Deny CRMI Seats to Foreign Medical Graduates Citing Stipend Costs    

Supreme Court: Actual Statement Made by Person in the Court is Evidence Before Court - (16 Apr 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Supreme Court has observed that a statement made by a person in the Court itself is to be considered as evidence before the Court and not the statement that has been recorded under Section 50 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   SECTION 50 OF PMLA   EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved