SC: Forfeiture of Earnest Money Impermissible When Both Buyer and Seller are at Fault  ||  Supreme Court: Gravity of Offence Cannot Defeat Speedy Trial; Pre-Trial Detention is Punishment  ||  SC: Terrorist Act under UAPA Includes Conspiracies to Disrupt Essential Supplies, Not Just Violence  ||  Supreme Court Directs Measures to Prevent False and Frivolous Complaints Against Judicial Officers  ||  SC: Mere Participation in Arbitration Doesn’t Bar Challenging Arbitrator; Waiver Must be in Writing  ||  SC: Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, the Plaintiff, as Dominus Litis, Cannot be Forced to Add a Defendant  ||  SC: Law Does Not Change With a New Bench; Decisions of a Coordinate Bench are Binding  ||  Delhi HC Absence of Formal Arrest under Section 311A Crpc Does Not Bar Giving Handwriting Samples  ||  Del HC: Security Guards Performing Duties Cannot Be Prosecuted For Wrongful Restraint or Molestation  ||  Bombay HC: Housing Society Earning From Telecom Towers Isn’t An ‘Industry’; Staff Get No Gratuity    

All. HC: Arbitrator to Decide Whether Claims Prior to Work Order are Covered by Arb. Clause or Not - (15 Apr 2024)

ARBITRATION

Allahabad High Court has held that it is upon the arbitrator to decide whether claims between the parties prior to the work order in question can be covered by arbitration clause or not and it is not upon the Court to decide the same under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   SECTION 11 A&C ACT   ARBITRATION CLAUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved