SC: Public Premises Act Prevails over State Rent Laws For Evicting Unauthorised Occupants  ||  SC: Doctors Were Unwavering Heroes in COVID-19, and Their Sacrifice Remains Indelible  ||  SC Sets Up Secondary Medical Board to Assess Passive Euthanasia Plea of Man in Vegetative State  ||  NCLAT: Amounts Listed As ‘Other Advances’ in Company’s Balance Sheet aren’t Financial Debt under IBC  ||  NCLT Ahmedabad: Objections to Coc Cannot Bar RP From Challenging Preferential Transactions  ||  J&K&L HC: Courts Should Exercise Caution When Granting Interim Relief in Public Infrastructure Cases  ||  Bombay HC: SARFAESI Sale Invalid if Sale Certificate is Not Issued Prior to IBC Moratorium  ||  Supreme Court: Police May Freeze Bank Accounts under S.102 CrPC in Prevention of Corruption Cases  ||  SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends on Time Expiry; Substituted Arbitrator Must Continue After Extension  ||  SC: Woman May Move Her Department’s ICC For Harassment by Employee of Another Workplace    

All. HC: Arbitrator to Decide Whether Claims Prior to Work Order are Covered by Arb. Clause or Not - (15 Apr 2024)

ARBITRATION

Allahabad High Court has held that it is upon the arbitrator to decide whether claims between the parties prior to the work order in question can be covered by arbitration clause or not and it is not upon the Court to decide the same under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   SECTION 11 A&C ACT   ARBITRATION CLAUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved