NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

All. HC: Arbitrator to Decide Whether Claims Prior to Work Order are Covered by Arb. Clause or Not - (15 Apr 2024)

ARBITRATION

Allahabad High Court has held that it is upon the arbitrator to decide whether claims between the parties prior to the work order in question can be covered by arbitration clause or not and it is not upon the Court to decide the same under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   SECTION 11 A&C ACT   ARBITRATION CLAUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved