Supreme Court: Foreign Companies’ Head Office Expenses in India are Capped under Section 44C  ||  SC Directs Trial Courts to Systematically Catalogue Witnesses and Evidence in Criminal Judgments  ||  SC Calls For Sensitising Future Generations on Equality in Marriage to Combat Dowry Practices  ||  SC: Separate Suits Against Confirmed Auction Sales are Barred; Remedy Available under Sec 47  ||  NCLT Mumbai: Oppression Claims Against Majority Shareholders Do not Justify Winding up a Company  ||  J&K&L HC Rules it Illegal and Inequitable to Deny Regularisation to a Daily Wager After 34 Years  ||  J&K&L High Court: Revisional Powers Must Be Used Within Reasonable Time; Merits Don’t Justify Delay  ||  Supreme Court: Compassionate Appointees Cannot Later Claim Entitlement to a Higher Post  ||  NCLAT New Delhi: Insolvency Pleas Cannot Be Admitted When Information Utility Records Show a Dispute  ||  NCLAT: Issuing Cheques For Another Entity’s Liabilities Does not Constitute Operational Debt    

All. HC: Arbitrator to Decide Whether Claims Prior to Work Order are Covered by Arb. Clause or Not - (15 Apr 2024)

ARBITRATION

Allahabad High Court has held that it is upon the arbitrator to decide whether claims between the parties prior to the work order in question can be covered by arbitration clause or not and it is not upon the Court to decide the same under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Tags : ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT   SECTION 11 A&C ACT   ARBITRATION CLAUSE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved