SC: Statutory Authorities may Intervene When Housing Societies Delay Membership Decisions  ||  SC: Quasi-Judicial Authorities Cannot Exercise Review Powers Unless Expressly Granted By Statute  ||  SC: Special Court Cannot Order Confiscation While Appeal Against Attachment Confirmation is Pending  ||  SC: Photocopies are Not Evidence Unless Conditions for Leading Secondary Evidence are Proved  ||  Calcutta HC: Conviction under Essential Commodities Act Invalid if Stock Measured With a 'Stick'  ||  Kerala High Court: Universities Must Regulate Student Political Activities to Curb Campus Violence  ||  Calcutta HC: Accused Has No Right on Investigation Mode or Impleadment in Probe Writ  ||  Gauhati HC: POCSO Probes Must be Child-Friendly, With Sensitized Investigators to Ensure Clear Truth  ||  Kerala HC: Orders Barring Disclosure of Witness Statements Must State Reasons For Each Witness  ||  SC: Hard to Believe Married Woman Was Lured Into Sex by False Marriage Promise; Case Quashed    

Cannot Disclose Identity of POCSO Victim, Supreme Court Calls for Sensitization - (08 Apr 2024)

CRIMINAL

SC has observed that exercise of sensitization of judicial officers and police officers is required to be done in the State of West Bengal to ensure compliance of the mandatory requirement that identity of victims under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO) is not disclosed.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   POCSO VICTIM   IDENTITY   SENSITIZATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved