NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Cannot Disclose Identity of POCSO Victim, Supreme Court Calls for Sensitization - (08 Apr 2024)

CRIMINAL

SC has observed that exercise of sensitization of judicial officers and police officers is required to be done in the State of West Bengal to ensure compliance of the mandatory requirement that identity of victims under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO) is not disclosed.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   POCSO VICTIM   IDENTITY   SENSITIZATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved