SC: Appeal U/S 374 CrPC/415 BNSS is Not Maintainable Against Sessions Court's Reversal of Acquittal  ||  SC Asked the Centre to Promote Awareness About the Consequences of Driving With an Expired Licence  ||  SC Explains How a Deceased Christian Wife's Property Devolves under the Indian Succession Act  ||  Supreme Court: Reach Stacker isn't a Motor Vehicle; MACT Claim Not Maintainable  ||  Supreme Court: Lift Makers, Operators and Owners Share Responsibility for User Safety  ||  Patna HC: Pressure to Sign Divorce and Child Custody does not Amount to Cruelty  ||  Bombay HC: Externment under the Police Act Requires Satisfaction About a Gang's Activities  ||  Bombay HC: False Travel Distance Claim Alone Doesn't Constitute Misappropriation  ||  J&K&L High Court: Interest on Delayed Gratuity is Not a Mandatory Pre-Deposit For an Appeal  ||  Meghalaya HC: Meritorious Candidate Cannot Be Denied Admission For a Two-Minute Delay    

Cannot Disclose Identity of POCSO Victim, Supreme Court Calls for Sensitization - (08 Apr 2024)

CRIMINAL

SC has observed that exercise of sensitization of judicial officers and police officers is required to be done in the State of West Bengal to ensure compliance of the mandatory requirement that identity of victims under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012(POCSO) is not disclosed.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   POCSO VICTIM   IDENTITY   SENSITIZATION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved