Whether a Life-Threatening Rescue by Cop Can be Treated as Routine Duty, Madhya Pradesh HC Clarifies  ||  Madhya Pradesh HC: Officer Cannot Oversee Department Conducting Disciplinary Proceedings Against Him  ||  Madras High Court: POCSO Act Does Not Exempt Romantic Relationships Involving Minors  ||  SC Upholds Haryana Rule Delaying Aid to Kin Accused of Murdering Government Employees  ||  Supreme Court: Lokayukta Special Police is Not Exempt From RTI as an Intelligence Body  ||  Supreme Court: Curable Irregularity in Appointments Cannot Nullify Entire Recruitment Process  ||  SC: Dismissal, Being the Severest Punishment, Should be Imposed Only For Grave Misconduct  ||  SC: Constructive Res Judicata Applies to Grounds Omitted Through Negligence or Inadvertence  ||  Madras High Court: Honour Killing is a Shameful Act and an Extreme Manifestation of Casteism  ||  Bombay High Court: Traditional Families Often Hesitate to Report Sexual Offences    

Supreme Court: Union’s Plea to Condone Delay of Twelve Years Refused - (05 Apr 2024)

LIMITATION

SC stated that once it is held that a party has lost its right to have the matter considered on merits because of its own inaction for a long period, it cannot be said to be non-deliberate delay, hence party cannot plead that the substantial justice deserves preference over technical considerations.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DELAY   UNION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved