Delhi HC: Passing Off is a Distinct Right, Which Resides in its Own Common Law Space  ||  Delhi HC Seeks ICICI’s Response on Plea Alleging Lack of Accessibility Standards for PWDs  ||  Bombay HC: Saying ‘I Love You’ in with No Sexual Intent Isn’t Sexual Harassment  ||  Rajasthan HC: Centre & State to Issue Directions Regarding Excessive Use of Mobile Phones by Children  ||  Allahabad HC: Undressing Woman but Failing to Commit Intercourse Amounts to ‘Attempt to Rape’  ||  MP HC: Taxpayers with Appeals that are Pending are Eligible for 50% Relief under Samadhan Scheme  ||  Del. HC: Indian Citizen Apprehending Arrest for Offence Committed Abroad Can Invoke Sec. 438 of CrPC  ||  Delhi HC: Can Grant Ad-Interim Maintenance without Filing Specific Application  ||  Delhi HC: Govt. to Take Steps for Involving Mental Health Professionals in Premature Release Process  ||  Del. HC: “Goodwill” for Purposes of Passing off, is in the Name Under Which Business Is Done    

Supreme Court: Union’s Plea to Condone Delay of Twelve Years Refused - (05 Apr 2024)

LIMITATION

SC stated that once it is held that a party has lost its right to have the matter considered on merits because of its own inaction for a long period, it cannot be said to be non-deliberate delay, hence party cannot plead that the substantial justice deserves preference over technical considerations.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   DELAY   UNION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved