SC: Dismissal, Being the Severest Punishment, Should be Imposed Only For Grave Misconduct  ||  SC: Constructive Res Judicata Applies to Grounds Omitted Through Negligence or Inadvertence  ||  Madras High Court: Honour Killing is a Shameful Act and an Extreme Manifestation of Casteism  ||  Bombay High Court: Traditional Families Often Hesitate to Report Sexual Offences  ||  Jharkhand High Court Directs Circle Officers to Digitally Verify Land Records and Remove Mismatches  ||  MP High Court: Writ Court Cannot Grant Interim Relief Once Party is Relegated to Alternate Forum  ||  Supreme Court Issues Directions to Speed Up MACT Claims Amid Six-Year Average Pendency  ||  Supreme Court: Sex Selection Practices Continues Due to Preference For Male Children  ||  Supreme Court: Injury From a Fallen Tree is Not a Motor Accident for MACT Claims  ||  Madras HC: Recent Tamil Nadu Elections Reflect Voting Beyond Caste and Community Considerations    

Ker. HC: Writ Jurisdiction Cannot be Invoked to Re-Appreciate Evidence in Disciplinary Proceedings - (01 Apr 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Kerala High Court has held that the Court cannot consider the question about the sufficiency or adequacy of evidence in support of a particular conclusion in a disciplinary proceeding through invoking powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Tags : KERALA HIGH COURT   DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS   WRIT JURISDICTION  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved