NCLAT: Consideration of Debt Restructuring by Lenders Doesn’t Bar Member from Initiating Proceedings  ||  Delhi High Court: In Matters of Medical Evaluation, Courts Should Exercise Restraint  ||  Delhi HC: Any Person in India Has Right to Legally Import Goods from Abroad and Sell the Same  ||  Delhi HC: Waiver to Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act to be Given Once Tribunal is Constituted  ||  Supreme Court Has Asked States to Regularise Existing Court Managers  ||  SC: Union & States to Create Special POSCO Courts on Top Priority  ||  SC Upholds Authority of CERC to Award Compensation for Delays  ||  SC: Arbitral Tribunal Has Discretion to Include in Sum Awarded, Interest at Rate as it Deems Reasonab  ||  SC: Cannot Use Article 142 to Frame Guidelines on Judicial Recusal  ||  SC: Satisfaction Recorder in One EP Won’t Affect Subsequent EPs for Future Breaches    

Kar. HC: Can’t Accept Photostat Copy of Unregistered Sale Agreement as Secondary Evidence - (19 Mar 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Karnataka High Court has held that for a trial being held under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a photocopy of an unregistered sale agreement cannot be admitted as secondary evidence only on the ground that the accused has admitted his signature in the said document.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   SECTION 138 OF NI ACT   UNREGISTERED SALE AGREEMENT   SECONDARY EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved