Calcutta HC: Employee Looking for Another Job with Rival Company Isn’t Contrary  ||  Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered  ||  Allahabad HC: Can’t Call Hindu Marriage Invalid Only because it Isn’t Registered  ||  Allahabad HC: No Power on Police to Open History-Sheet on Likes or Dislikes  ||  Rajasthan HC Puts Stay on Installation of Dairy Booth Outside Private Residence  ||  Calcutta HC: Cannot Summon Accused to Produce Incriminating Evidence against Himself  ||  Kerala HC Upholds STA’s decision mandating installation of cameras with Fatigue Detection Censors  ||  SC: Executive Instructions Cannot Override Statutory Recruitment Processes  ||  Delhi Lieutenant Governor’s Notification regarding Evidence of Police officers Put on Hold  ||  SC Issues Notice in Plea to Bring Bar Councils under POSH Act    

Kar. HC: Can’t Accept Photostat Copy of Unregistered Sale Agreement as Secondary Evidence - (19 Mar 2024)

LAW OF EVIDENCE

Karnataka High Court has held that for a trial being held under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a photocopy of an unregistered sale agreement cannot be admitted as secondary evidence only on the ground that the accused has admitted his signature in the said document.

Tags : KARNATAKA HIGH COURT   SECTION 138 OF NI ACT   UNREGISTERED SALE AGREEMENT   SECONDARY EVIDENCE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved