SC: Daughter Doesn't Lose Ties With Natal Family After Marriage, Such Stereotype is Unconstitutional  ||  SC: Limitation For Filing S.34 Appeal Starts From Disposal of S.33 Application, Allowed or Rejected  ||  SC: In Cases of Drug Trade Threats to the Nation, Sovereignty Prevails over Personal Liberty  ||  Delhi HC: Plaintiff Can Obtain a Refund of Court Fees After an IBC Resolution Plan “Settlement”  ||  Ker HC: Default Bail is Available if Final Report is E-Filed After 5 Pm on Last Statutory Day  ||  J&K&L HC: NDPS Act Provisions Extending Investigation Time Apply to Narco-Terror Cases under UAPA  ||  Supreme Court: Courts Have Sometimes Failed Arbitration, With Interference Curing No Disease  ||  Supreme Court: Co-Heir Cannot Sell Other Heirs' Shares as Karta After Intestate Succession  ||  SC: Casual Labourers With Temporary Status are Eligible For Pension Even Without Regularisation  ||  Supreme Court: High Courts Must Record the Nature of Crime and Allegations While Quashing FIRs    

Del. HC: Dish TV Not Entitled to Protection u/s 30(2) of Trade Marks Act for Using the Word ‘Dish’ - (13 Mar 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court has held that Dish TV India Limited cannot seek protection under Section 30(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 for using the word ‘Dish’ as it is generic in nature and is a common English word over which monopoly cannot be permitted.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   SECTION 30 OF TM ACT   MONOPOLY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved