SC: Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act Preference For Class-I Heirs Applies to Agricultural Land  ||  Supreme Court: Refund Clause in Sale Agreement Does Not Extinguish Right to Specific Performance  ||  SC Clarifies When a Probate Application Filed After a Testator's Death is Time-Barred  ||  Madras HC: Coordinate Bench Cannot Reopen Issue Already Settled by Another Division Bench  ||  Delhi HC Urges Law to Regulate Media, Notes Anyone with a Mobile Phone Can Claim to be a Journalist  ||  CCI Rejects Allegations of Collusion Involving Reliance Jio and More Than 4,500 Entities  ||  Allahabad HC: Working Mother with Child Custody Cannot Shift Entire Maintenance Liability to Father  ||  Bombay HC: Possessory Suit U/S 6 of the SRA is Maintainable Despite a Licensor-Licensee Relationship  ||  Del HC: Master's Candidates Without the Prescribed Bachelor's Degree are Ineligible as Govt Teacher  ||  Cal HC: BSF Cannot Deny DIG Rank to an Officer Injured in 1995 Road Accident After Earlier Promotion    

Del. HC: Dish TV Not Entitled to Protection u/s 30(2) of Trade Marks Act for Using the Word ‘Dish’ - (13 Mar 2024)

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Delhi High Court has held that Dish TV India Limited cannot seek protection under Section 30(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 for using the word ‘Dish’ as it is generic in nature and is a common English word over which monopoly cannot be permitted.

Tags : DELHI HIGH COURT   SECTION 30 OF TM ACT   MONOPOLY  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved