-Manupatra

Supreme Court: After the BNSS, a Pre-Cognizance Hearing is Mandatory in PMLA Cases || SC: Landowners Cannot be Forced to Waive Statutory Compensation to Claim Other Benefits || Supreme Court: Banks are Lenient With Big Borrowers But Strict With Ordinary Loan Applicants || Delhi HC: Minimum Wages During Pending Litigation Cannot be Frozen and Must be Updated Periodically || Kerala HC: ICC Can Probe Sexual Harassment Complaint Against a Director Not Controlling Affairs || Delhi HC: Interim Protection From Blacklisting Does Not Remove Bidder’s Duty to Disclose in Tenders || Allahabad HC: After the BNSS, Pre-Cognizance Hearing of the Accused is Mandatory in NDPS Complaints || Delhi HC: Husband Cannot Avoid Maintenance For Wife and Children by Claiming Irregular Income || SC: Repeated Anticipatory Bail Pleas Abuse Process and Reduce Litigation to a Gamble || Supreme Court: State Officers Cannot Back Litigants Through Affidavits Against the Law

Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 after amendments made vide Finance Act, 2015 - (Ministry of Finance ) (18 Aug 2015)

Clarifications on Finance Act, 1994 and Central Excise Act, 1944