-Manupatra

Supreme Court: Anti-Suit Injunction Cannot Rest on Speculation of Unenforceable Foreign Decree || SC: High Court’s Location doesn't Become Arbitration Seat Merely by Appointing Arbitrator || SC Disapproves PIL Challenging Inter-Se Evaluation of Tender Bids || Delhi HC: Bail Grant or Cancellation Cannot Depend on Monetary Settlement With Complainant || Kerala HC Directs Bar Council to Publish List of Advocates Practising Without AIBE Clearance, CoP || Rajasthan HC: Candidate Cannot Blame E-Mitra for Failing to Correct Caste Category Within Deadline || Patna HC: Mere FIR Registration cannot Justify Cancellation of PDS Licence || Calcutta HC: NEET Medical Board Cannot Reassess Disability Percentage of PwBD Candidates || Madras HC: MLAs Cannot Challenge Assembly Vote Later if They Raised No Objection During Voting || Karnataka HC Upholds DRDO Land Acquisition, Citing Primacy of National Security

Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 after amendments made vide Finance Act, 2015 - (Ministry of Finance ) (18 Aug 2015)

Clarifications on Finance Act, 1994 and Central Excise Act, 1944