-Manupatra

Bombay HC: Insolvency Cannot be Used to Evade a Family Court’s Maintenance Order || Kerala HC: Forklifts and Factory Cranes Are Motor Vehicles and Must be Registered under MV Act || Guj HC: Edible Crude Palm Kernel Oil Qualifies for Duty Exemption; End-Use Condition not Applicable || NCLAT Delhi: Advance under Land-Development MoU is not Financial Debt and Cannot Trigger CIRP || NCLAT: NCLT Cannot Change Capital Structure of a Legally Compliant Successful Auction Purchaser || Supreme Court: Endless Investigation and Long Delay in Filing Chargesheet Can Justify Quashing Case || SC: Landowners Accepting Compensation Settlements Cannot Later Claim Statutory Benefits || Supreme Court: Provident Fund Dues Have Priority over a Bank’s Claim under the SARFAESI Act || Supreme Court: Indian Courts Cannot Appoint Arbitrators for Arbitrations Seated Outside India || Madras HC: Police Superintendent not Liable For IO’s Delay In Filing Chargesheet or Closure Report

Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 after amendments made vide Finance Act, 2015 - (Ministry of Finance ) (18 Aug 2015)

Clarifications on Finance Act, 1994 and Central Excise Act, 1944