-Manupatra

SC: Clarificatory Statement Does Not Constitute a Binding Undertaking for Contempt Proceedings || Supreme Court: Litigant Cannot be Worse Off for Filing an Appeal under ‘No Reformatio in Peius’ || Orissa HC: Article 22(1) Arrest Rights Pre-Exist, Written Grounds Ruling Not Prospective || Kerala HC: Kissing a Child’s Penis Constitutes Penetrative Sexual Assault under POCSO || Madras HC: Married Daughter Cannot be Denied Compassionate Appointment Solely for Her Marriage || Bombay High Court: Child Welfare Prevails as ‘Joint Parenting’ is Not Recognised in Indian Law || Kerala HC: Minor’s Consent or Relationship with Accused Holds No Relevance under POCSO Act || Bombay HC: Failure to Prove Exact Quantum of Loss Does Not Bar Compensation || CCPA Fines Dial4Trade Rs. 10 Lakh for Online Ammonium Nitrate Listing Featuring Blast Images || Supreme Court: Multiple Cases Alone Cannot Justify an Externment Order

Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 after amendments made vide Finance Act, 2015 - (Ministry of Finance ) (18 Aug 2015)

Clarifications on Finance Act, 1994 and Central Excise Act, 1944