-Manupatra

SC: Recoveries U/S 27 of Evidence Act Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction; 1988 Murder Acquittal Restored || SC: Successive Impleadment Applications are Barred by Res Judicata under Different CPC Provisions || Supreme Court Halts Coercive Measures in CJP Protest Cases, Directs Release of Minors || Supreme Court: National Commission for Scheduled Castes Lacks Power to Pass Binding Orders || Bombay HC: Alleged Illegal Arrest Alone Cannot Trigger Contempt Action Against Police || Bombay HC Quashes Order against Taiwan National, Says Online Study Didn't Breach Visa Rules || P&H High Court Issues Directions on LADC Scheme After Reviewing Lawyers' Objections || Allahabad HC: Suspension of Sentence Plea Need Not Take Priority if Appeal is Ready || Allahabad High Court: Surcharge Recovery From Pradhan Must Follow Panchayat Raj Act Procedure || Allahabad HC Directs IB Probe into 4 Lucknow Lawyers, Raises Concern over Lawyer-Police Nexus

Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 after amendments made vide Finance Act, 2015 - (Ministry of Finance ) (18 Aug 2015)

Clarifications on Finance Act, 1994 and Central Excise Act, 1944