-Manupatra

Supreme Court: Foreign Judgment Unenforceable in India Without Fair Opportunity to Defend || Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Decide Appeal Pending Before Statutory Authority Due to Delay || Supreme Court: SDO Lacks Authority to Change Land Classification under UP Zamindari Abolition Act || Supreme Court: Man Not Liable For Maintenance if DNA Test Proves He is Not the Child’s Father || SC: Prison Must Not Dilute Rights of Disabled Inmates; Oversight Given to High-Powered Panel || Delhi High Court: Judges Would Have to Recuse if Children as Central Govt Counsel is Treated as Bias || Delhi HC: Fresh Tenders Allowed Despite Existing Contracts; Anticipatory Grievances Not Entertained || Delhi High Court: Judges Cannot Respond Publicly; Criticism Must Be Responsible and Evidence-Based || J&K&L High Court: IO Not Bound By FIR; Can Modify Offences in Final Chargesheet U/S 173 CrPC || Supreme Court: Brief Service Breaks Do Not Bar Ad Hoc Employees From Regularisation

Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 after amendments made vide Finance Act, 2015 - (Ministry of Finance ) (18 Aug 2015)

Clarifications on Finance Act, 1994 and Central Excise Act, 1944