NCLAT: Can’t Dismiss Restoration App. if Filed in 30 Days from Date of Dismissal of Original App.  ||  Delhi HC: Communication between Parties through Whatsapp Constitute Valid Agreement  ||  Delhi HC Seeks Response from Govt. Over Penalties on Petrol Pumps Supplying Fuel to Old Vehicles  ||  Centre Notifies "Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency and Development Rules, 2025"  ||  Del. HC: Can’t Reject TM Owner’s Claim Merely because Defendant Could have Sought Removal of Mark  ||  Bombay HC: Cannot Treat Sole Director of OPC, Parallelly with Separate Legal Entity  ||  Delhi HC: Can Apply 'Family of Marks' Concept to Injunct Specific Marks  ||  HP HC: Can’t Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree for Mere Irregularity  ||  Cal. HC: Order by HC Bench Not Conferred With Determination by Roster is Void  ||  Calcutta HC: Purchase Order Including Arbitration Agreement to Prevail Over Tax Invoice Lacking it    

Pradip Kr. Modak v. Union of India & Ors. - (High Court of Calcutta) (20 May 2016)

CISF constable’s dismissal for unprovoked aggression at DMRC station upheld

MANU/WB/0409/2016

Criminal

CISF personnel posted at DMRC metro station held to have been rightly dismissed for behaving rudely with and assaulting a person in plain clothes.

The court recorded that the conduct of the Petitioner-CISF personnel was aggressive and there was little in the record to suggest provocation by the other person. Incidentally, the ‘other person’ was himself plain clothes CISF personnel. Though neither of the parties were examined, the court noted evidence from civilian passengers and CCTV footage, which proved beyond doubt his guilt.

Though it considered a more lenient view to the matter, the same was abandoned with Justice Ahluwalia noting, “he is a trained member of a disciplined Force…in full uniform himself, in a public place…[his] behaviour has tarnished the image of the Force at large”.

The court also had to brush away questions regarding its jurisdiction, for the incident occurred in Delhi. It observed that its jurisdiction was satisfied since the Order for dismissal was served on the Petitioner in his native village in West Bengal.

Relevant : General Manager, Eastern Coalfields ltd. & Anr. v. Rajender Singh & Ors. MANU/WB/0103/2003 Section 9 Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968

Tags : DMRC   CISF   UNPROVOKED   DISMISSAL FROM SERVICE  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved