MP HC: Policy of First Come, First Serve is Inherently Flawed  ||  Bombay HC: Arbitration Clause Giving Unilateral Power Does Not Render the Agreement Invalid  ||  Madras HC: Taxpayer Not Responding to Notices Should be Sent Reminder through RPAD  ||  Madras HC: Taxpayer Not Responding to Notices Should be Sent Reminder through RPAD  ||  Bombay HC: There is Prohibition Only on "Talaq-e-biddat" and Not on "Talaq-e-Ahsan"  ||  Bombay HC: Government Allottee Lacking Legal Occupation Can’t be Considered ‘Deemed Tenant’  ||  AP HC: If a “Necessary Party” is Not Impleaded, the Suit Itself is Liable to be Dismissed  ||  Delhi HC: No Affect on Charitable Trust’s Status for Making Payments for Services by Related Party  ||  Bombay HC Directs State Govt. to Upload State's Prison & Police Manual on Internet  ||  Delhi HC: If Use of Smoke Cannister a Terrorist Act then Every Holi & IPL Match Will Attract UAPA    

Calcutta High Court: Court Not Merely Obligated to Appoint Arbitrator u/s 11(6) of A&C Act - (23 Feb 2024)

ARBITRATION

Calcutta High Court has held that Court under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act is not merely obligated to appoint an arbitrator but can also decide the arbitrability of a dispute by a prima facie analysis.

Tags : CALCUTTA HIGH COURT   SECTION 11(6) OF A&C ACT   APPOINTMENT  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved