SC: Under RTE Act, States Cannot Justify Low Teacher Pay by Citing Centre’s Failure to Release Funds  ||  Supreme Court: While a Child’s Welfare is Paramount, It is Not the Sole Factor in Custody Disputes  ||  Supreme Court: High Court Cannot Reject a Plaint While Exercising Jurisdiction under Article 227  ||  SC: Merely Leasing an Apartment Does Not Bar a Flat Buyer’s Consumer Complaint Against the Builder  ||  Delhi HC: Unproven Adultery Allegations Cannot be Used to Deny Interim Maintenance under the DV Act  ||  Bombay HC: Storing Items in a Fridge isn’t Manufacturing and Doesn’t Make Premises a Factory  ||  Kerala HC: Disability Pension is Not Payable if the Condition is Unrelated to Military Service  ||  Supreme Court: Award Valid Even If Passed After Mandate Expiry When Court Extends Time  ||  Jharkhand HC: Regular Bail Plea During Interim Bail is Not Maintainable under Section 483 BNSS  ||  Cal HC: Theft Claims and Public Humiliation Alone Don’t Amount To Abetment of Suicide U/S 306 IPC    

Supreme Court: Definition of Forest Given By Godavarman Judgment Should Be Followed By States/UTs - (20 Feb 2024)

CIVIL

Supreme Court while passing an interim order has directed the State and Union Territiories to act in accordance with the definition of forest given in judgement of N. Godavarman Thirumalpad v. UOI till the land recorded as forests is identified as per the 2023 amendment to Forest (Conservation) Act.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   FOREST (CONSERVATION) ACT   N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMALPAD V. UOI  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved