NCLT: Suspended Directors Who are Prospective Resolution Applicants Cann’t Access Valuation Reports  ||  Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Granting Bail to Accused Added at Trial under Section 319 CrPC  ||  SC: Fresh Notification For Vijayawada ACB Police Station not Required After AP Bifurcation  ||  SC: Studying in a Government Institute Does Not Create an Automatic Right to a Government Job  ||  NCLT Mumbai: CIRP Claims Cannot Invoke the 12-Year Limitation Period For Enforcing Mortgage Rights  ||  NCLAT: Misnaming Guarantor as 'Director' in SARFAESI Notice Doesn't Void Guarantee Invocation  ||  Jharkhand HC: Mere Breach of Compromise Terms by an Accused Does Not Justify Bail Cancellation  ||  Cal HC: Banks Cannot Freeze a Company's Accounts Solely Due To ROC Labeling a 'Management Dispute'  ||  Rajasthan HC: Father’s Rape of His Daughter Transcends Ordinary Crime; Victim’s Testimony Suffices  ||  Delhi HC: Judge Who Reserved Judgment Must Deliver Verdict Despite Transfer; Successor Can't Rehear    

Supreme Court: Definition of Forest Given By Godavarman Judgment Should Be Followed By States/UTs - (20 Feb 2024)

CIVIL

Supreme Court while passing an interim order has directed the State and Union Territiories to act in accordance with the definition of forest given in judgement of N. Godavarman Thirumalpad v. UOI till the land recorded as forests is identified as per the 2023 amendment to Forest (Conservation) Act.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   FOREST (CONSERVATION) ACT   N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMALPAD V. UOI  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2026 - All Rights Reserved