J&K&L HC: Matrimonial Remedies May Overlap, But Cruelty Claims Cannot be Selectively Invoked  ||  Delhi High Court: Customs Officials Acting Officially Cannot be Cross-Examined as of Right  ||  J&K&L HC: Second Arbitral Reference is Maintainable if Award is Set Aside Without Deciding Merits  ||  J&K&L HC: Gold Voluntarily Given to Customer is 'Entrustment'; Theft Excluded from Insurance Cover  ||  Delhi HC: Working Mothers Cannot be Forced to Bear Full Childcare Burden While Fathers Evade Duty  ||  J&K&L HC: Arbitral Tribunal Not a “Court”; Giving False Evidence Before it Doesn’t Attract S.195 CrPC  ||  Calcutta HC: Award May Be Set Aside if Tribunal Rewrites Contract or Ignores Key Clauses  ||  Delhi HC Suspends Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Life Term, Holding Section 5(C) of POCSO Not Made Out  ||  Calcutta High Court: Arbitration Clause in an Expired Lease Cannot be Invoked For a Fresh Lease  ||  Delhi High Court: 120-Day Timeline under Section 132B Of Income Tax Act is Not Mandatory    

Supreme Court: Definition of Forest Given By Godavarman Judgment Should Be Followed By States/UTs - (20 Feb 2024)

CIVIL

Supreme Court while passing an interim order has directed the State and Union Territiories to act in accordance with the definition of forest given in judgement of N. Godavarman Thirumalpad v. UOI till the land recorded as forests is identified as per the 2023 amendment to Forest (Conservation) Act.

Tags : SUPREME COURT   FOREST (CONSERVATION) ACT   N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMALPAD V. UOI  

Share :        

Disclaimer | Copyright 2025 - All Rights Reserved